Ye Zusen, Ye Qiang, Shao Bei, He Jincai, Zhu Zhenguo, Cheng Jianhua, Chen Yanyan, Chen Siyan, Huang Xiaoya
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou 325000, P. R. China.
Department of Neurology, Wenzhou Central Hospital & Dingli Clinical Institute of Wenzhou Medical University Wenzhou 325000, P. R. China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):20796-804. eCollection 2015.
The present study is to use meta-analysis to explain the association between alpha-1 antichymotrypsin (ACT) gene A/T polymorphism and the risk of primary intracerebral hemorrhage (PICH). Relevant studies before 1 June 2015 were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane database and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and the references of retrieved articles. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Five independent publications, with 774 PICH cases and 940 controls, were included. There was no statistical evidence of association between ACT polymorphism and PICH risk under all genetic models in overall estimates (allele model: OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.80-1.28; heterozygote model: OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.60-1.45; homozygote model: OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.59-1.80; dominant model: OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.65-1.46; recessive model: OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.72-1.57). No association was found in subgroup analysis based on ethnicity, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, location of hematoma and blood pressure. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the combined results were stable and reliable. No significant publication bias was found by Begg's test and Egger's regression test. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that ACT polymorphism is unlikely to contribute to PICH susceptibility.
本研究旨在运用荟萃分析来阐释α-1抗糜蛋白酶(ACT)基因A/T多态性与原发性脑出血(PICH)风险之间的关联。通过检索PubMed、Cochrane数据库和科学引文索引扩展版(SCIE)以及检索文章的参考文献,确定了2015年6月1日前的相关研究。采用合并比值比(OR)及相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)来评估关联强度。纳入了5篇独立出版物,共774例PICH病例和940例对照。总体估计中,在所有遗传模型下,ACT多态性与PICH风险之间均无统计学关联证据(等位基因模型:OR = 1.01,95%CI = 0.80 - 1.28;杂合子模型:OR = 0.93,95%CI = 0.60 - 1.45;纯合子模型:OR = 1.03,95%CI = 0.59 - 1.80;显性模型:OR = 0.97,95%CI = 0.65 - 1.46;隐性模型:OR = 1.06,95%CI = 0.72 - 1.57)。基于种族、哈迪-温伯格平衡、血肿位置和血压的亚组分析未发现关联。敏感性分析表明合并结果稳定可靠。Begg检验和Egger回归检验未发现显著的发表偏倚。我们的荟萃分析结果表明,ACT多态性不太可能导致PICH易感性。