van Rooij Frank G, Kessels Roy P C, Richard Edo, De Leeuw Frank-Erik, van Dijk Ewoud J
Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;42(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1159/000444282. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Although by definition a transient ischemic attack (TIA) lasts less than 24 h, many patients experience cognitive complaints beyond focal symptom resolution. However, their prevalence, causes and profile are unclear. We therefore performed a systematic review on cognitive impairment after TIA.
Medline and Embase were searched for relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed, and data synthesis was performed according to the severity of cognitive impairment. Thirteen studies were included, with considerable heterogeneity concerning methods and timing of cognitive testing. Confounding, detection bias and attrition were the main causes of a high risk of bias in several studies. The prevalence of post-TIA mild cognitive impairment ranged from 29 to 68%. Severe cognitive impairment was found in 8-22% of patients. Studies using a cognitive screening instrument and those performed shortly after TIA or several years later, reported the highest frequencies of impairment. Patients evaluated with a screening tool were substantially older than those who underwent a full neuropsychological assessment (weighted mean age difference 10.9 years). Based on limited data, the post-TIA cognitive profile showed prominent executive function deficits. Insufficient data refrained us from drawing conclusions on causality. The few studies that reported neuroimaging results found a minor correlation with cognitive impairment.
Mild cognitive impairment is present in more than a third of the TIA patients and has a profile comparable with vascular cognitive impairment. Reported rates of post-TIA cognitive impairment are highly variable and higher frequencies are found with cognitive screening tools. Considerable heterogeneity and insufficient data limit further conclusions about potential causative factors.
尽管根据定义,短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)持续时间少于24小时,但许多患者在局灶性症状缓解后仍有认知方面的主诉。然而,其患病率、病因和特征尚不清楚。因此,我们对TIA后的认知障碍进行了系统评价。
检索了Medline和Embase数据库中的相关研究。评估了偏倚风险,并根据认知障碍的严重程度进行了数据合成。纳入了13项研究,在认知测试方法和时间方面存在相当大的异质性。混杂因素、检测偏倚和失访是几项研究中高偏倚风险的主要原因。TIA后轻度认知障碍的患病率为29%至68%。8%至22%的患者存在严重认知障碍。使用认知筛查工具的研究以及在TIA后不久或几年后进行的研究报告的障碍发生率最高。使用筛查工具评估的患者比接受全面神经心理学评估的患者年龄大得多(加权平均年龄差10.9岁)。基于有限的数据,TIA后的认知特征显示出明显的执行功能缺陷。数据不足使我们无法就因果关系得出结论。少数报告神经影像学结果的研究发现与认知障碍有轻微相关性。
超过三分之一的TIA患者存在轻度认知障碍,其特征与血管性认知障碍相当。报告的TIA后认知障碍发生率差异很大,使用认知筛查工具时发现的频率更高。相当大的异质性和数据不足限制了对潜在病因因素的进一步结论。