Bellis Mark A, Hughes Karen, Nicholls James, Sheron Nick, Gilmore Ian, Jones Lisa
College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2PZ, UK.
Public Health Wales, Hadyn Ellis Building, Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 18;16:111. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2766-x.
Internationally, studies show that similar levels of alcohol consumption in deprived communities (vs. more affluent) result in higher levels of alcohol-related ill health. Hypotheses to explain this alcohol harm paradox include deprived drinkers: suffering greater combined health challenges (e.g. smoking, obesity) which exacerbate effects of alcohol harms; exhibiting more harmful consumption patterns (e.g. bingeing); having a history of more harmful consumption; and disproportionately under-reporting consumption. We use a bespoke national survey to assess each of these hypotheses.
A national telephone survey designed to test this alcohol harm paradox was undertaken (May 2013 to April 2014) with English adults (n = 6015). Deprivation was assigned by area of residence. Questions examined factors including: current and historic drinking patterns; combined health challenges (smoking, diet, exercise and body mass); and under-reported consumption (enhanced questioning on atypical/special occasion drinking). For each factor, analyses examined differences between deprived and more affluent individuals controlled for total alcohol consumption.
Independent of total consumption, deprived drinkers were more likely to smoke, be overweight and report poor diet and exercise. Consequently, deprived increased risk drinkers (male >168-400 g, female >112-280 g alcohol/week) were >10 times more likely than non-deprived counterparts to drink in a behavioural syndrome combining smoking, excess weight and poor diet/exercise. Differences by deprivation were significant but less marked in higher risk drinkers (male >400 g, female >280 g alcohol/week). Current binge drinking was associated with deprivation independently of total consumption and a history of bingeing was also associated with deprivation in lower and increased risk drinkers.
Deprived increased/higher drinkers are more likely than affluent counterparts to consume alcohol as part of a suite of health challenging behaviours including smoking, excess weight and poor diet/exercise. Together these can have multiplicative effects on risks of wholly (e.g. alcoholic liver disease) and partly (e.g. cancers) alcohol-related conditions. More binge drinking in deprived individuals will also increase risks of injury and heart disease despite total alcohol consumption not differing from affluent counterparts. Public health messages on how smoking, poor diet/exercise and bingeing escalate health risks associated with alcohol are needed, especially in deprived communities, as their absence will contribute to health inequalities.
国际研究表明,在贫困社区(与较富裕社区相比),相似水平的酒精消费会导致更高水平的与酒精相关的健康问题。解释这种酒精危害悖论的假设包括贫困饮酒者:面临更大的综合健康挑战(如吸烟、肥胖),这会加剧酒精危害的影响;表现出更有害的消费模式(如暴饮);有更有害的消费史;以及消费情况报告严重不足。我们使用一项定制的全国性调查来评估这些假设中的每一个。
2013年5月至2014年4月对英国成年人(n = 6015)进行了一项旨在检验这种酒精危害悖论的全国性电话调查。根据居住地区确定贫困程度。问题涉及的因素包括:当前和过去的饮酒模式;综合健康挑战(吸烟、饮食、运动和体重);以及消费情况报告不足(对非典型/特殊场合饮酒进行强化询问)。对于每个因素,分析了在控制总酒精消费量的情况下贫困者和较富裕者之间的差异。
与总消费量无关,贫困饮酒者更有可能吸烟、超重,且饮食和运动习惯较差。因此,贫困的高风险饮酒者(男性每周饮酒>168 - 400克,女性每周饮酒>112 - 280克)出现吸烟、超重和饮食/运动习惯差这种行为综合征的可能性是非贫困者的10倍以上。贫困程度导致的差异很显著,但在更高风险饮酒者(男性每周饮酒>400克,女性每周饮酒>280克)中不太明显。当前的暴饮行为与贫困程度有关,与总消费量无关,而且在低风险和高风险饮酒者中,暴饮史也与贫困程度有关。
与富裕的饮酒者相比,贫困的高饮酒量者更有可能将饮酒作为一系列危害健康行为的一部分,这些行为包括吸烟、超重和饮食/运动习惯差。这些因素共同作用,可能对完全由酒精引起(如酒精性肝病)和部分由酒精引起(如癌症)的疾病风险产生倍增效应。尽管贫困者的总酒精消费量与富裕者没有差异,但贫困者中更多的暴饮行为也会增加受伤和患心脏病的风险。需要开展公共卫生宣传,告知人们吸烟、不良的饮食/运动习惯和暴饮行为如何加剧与酒精相关的健康风险,特别是在贫困社区,因为缺乏此类宣传会加剧健康不平等现象。