Rabey Martin, Smith Anne, Beales Darren, Slater Helen, O'Sullivan Peter
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Clin J Pain. 2016 Dec;32(12):1015-1027. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000363.
To explore the existence of subgroups in a cohort with chronic low back pain (n=294) based upon data from multiple psychological questionnaires, and profile subgroups on data from multiple dimensions.
Psychological questionnaires considered as indicator variables entered into latent class analysis included: Depression, Anxiety, Stress scales, Thought Suppression and Behavioural Endurance subscales (Avoidance Endurance questionnaire), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (short-form), Pain Catastrophising Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire. Multidimensional profiling of derived clusters included: demographics, pain characteristics, pain responses to movement, behaviors associated with pain, body perception, pain sensitivity, and health and lifestyle factors.
Three clusters were derived. Cluster 1 (23.5%) was characterized by low Cognitive and Affective Questionnaire scores, with the exception of fear-avoidance beliefs. Cluster 2 (58.8%) was characterized by relatively elevated thought suppression, catastrophizing, and fear-avoidance beliefs, but lower pain self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, and stress. Cluster 3 (17.7%) had the highest scores across cognitive and affective questionnaires.Cluster 1 reported significantly lower pain intensity and bothersomeness than other clusters. Disability, stressful life events, and low back region perceptual distortion increased progressively from cluster 1 to cluster 3, whereas mindfulness progressively decreased. Clusters 2 and 3 had more people with an increase in pain following repeated forward and backward spinal bending, and more people with increasing pain following bending, than cluster 1. Cluster 3 had significantly greater lumbar pressure pain sensitivity, more undiagnosed comorbid symptoms, and more widespread pain than other clusters.
Clinical implications relating to presentations of each cluster are postulated.
基于多项心理问卷数据,探讨慢性腰痛队列(n = 294)中是否存在亚组,并从多个维度对亚组进行描述。
纳入潜在类别分析作为指标变量的心理问卷包括:抑郁、焦虑、压力量表、思维抑制和行为耐力子量表(回避耐力问卷)、慢性疼痛接受问卷(简表)、疼痛灾难化量表、疼痛自我效能量表以及恐惧回避信念问卷。对所得聚类的多维度描述包括:人口统计学特征、疼痛特征、运动时的疼痛反应、与疼痛相关的行为、身体感知、疼痛敏感性以及健康和生活方式因素。
得出三个聚类。聚类1(23.5%)的特征是认知和情感问卷得分较低,但恐惧回避信念除外。聚类2(58.8%)的特征是思维抑制、灾难化和恐惧回避信念相对较高,但疼痛自我效能、抑郁、焦虑和压力较低。聚类3(17.7%)在认知和情感问卷中的得分最高。聚类1报告的疼痛强度和困扰程度明显低于其他聚类。残疾、应激性生活事件和下背部感知扭曲从聚类1到聚类3逐渐增加,而正念则逐渐降低。与聚类1相比,聚类2和聚类3中更多的人在反复向前和向后脊柱弯曲后疼痛增加,以及在弯曲后疼痛加剧。聚类3的腰椎压力疼痛敏感性明显更高,未确诊的共病症状更多,疼痛范围更广。
假设了与每个聚类表现相关的临床意义。