• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大肝脏区域共享的影响:“共享35”的两年结果

The impact of broader regional sharing of livers: 2-year results of "Share 35".

作者信息

Edwards Erick B, Harper Ann M, Hirose Ryutaro, Mulligan David C

机构信息

United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA.

University of California, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr;22(4):399-409. doi: 10.1002/lt.24418.

DOI:10.1002/lt.24418
PMID:26890858
Abstract

In June of 2013, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented regional sharing for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) candidates with scores reaching 35 and above ("Share 35"). The goal of this distribution change was to increase access to lifesaving transplants for the sickest candidates with chronic liver disease and to reduce the waiting-list mortality for this medically urgent group of patients. To assess the impact of this change, we compared results before and after policy implementation at 2 years. Overall, there were more liver transplants performed under Share 35 and a greater percentage of MELD/PELD 35+ candidates underwent transplantation; waiting-list mortality rates in this group were also significantly lower in the post-policy period. Overall adjusted waiting-list mortality was decreased slightly, with no significant changes in mortality by age group or ethnicity. Posttransplant graft and patient survival was unchanged overall and was unchanged for the MELD/PELD 35+ recipients. In conclusion, these data demonstrate that the Share 35 policy achieved its goal of increasing access to transplants for these medically urgent patients without reducing access to liver transplants for pediatric and minority candidates. Although the variance in the median MELD at transplant as well as the variance in transport distance increased, there was a decrease in overall liver discard rates and no change in overall cold ischemia times following broader sharing of these organs. The OPTN will continue to monitor this policy, particularly for longer-term posttransplant survival outcomes.

摘要

2013年6月,器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)对终末期肝病模型(MELD)/小儿终末期肝病(PELD)评分达到35分及以上的候选人实施了区域共享(“共享35”)。这一分配变化的目标是增加病情最严重的慢性肝病候选人获得挽救生命的移植的机会,并降低这一医疗紧急患者群体在等待名单上的死亡率。为评估这一变化的影响,我们比较了政策实施前后2年的结果。总体而言,在“共享35”政策下进行的肝移植更多,MELD/PELD 35分及以上的候选人接受移植的比例更高;该组在政策实施后的等待名单死亡率也显著降低。总体调整后的等待名单死亡率略有下降,各年龄组和种族的死亡率没有显著变化。移植后移植物和患者的总体生存率没有变化,MELD/PELD 35分及以上的受者的生存率也没有变化。总之,这些数据表明,“共享35”政策实现了其目标,即增加这些医疗紧急患者获得移植的机会,同时又不减少小儿和少数族裔候选人获得肝移植的机会。尽管移植时MELD中位数的差异以及运输距离的差异有所增加,但在这些器官更广泛共享后,总体肝脏丢弃率有所下降,总体冷缺血时间没有变化。OPTN将继续监测这一政策,特别是长期移植后的生存结果。

相似文献

1
The impact of broader regional sharing of livers: 2-year results of "Share 35".扩大肝脏区域共享的影响:“共享35”的两年结果
Liver Transpl. 2016 Apr;22(4):399-409. doi: 10.1002/lt.24418.
2
ABO blood group-related waiting list disparities in liver transplant candidates: effect of the MELD adoption.肝移植候选者中与ABO血型相关的等待名单差异:终末期肝病模型(MELD)采用的影响
Transplantation. 2008 Mar 27;85(6):844-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318166cc38.
3
The impact of MELD on OPTN liver allocation: preliminary results.终末期肝病模型(MELD)对器官共享联合网络(OPTN)肝脏分配的影响:初步结果。
Clin Transpl. 2002:21-8.
4
Survival on waiting list for liver transplantation before and after introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分引入前后肝移植等待名单上的生存率
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.005.
5
The pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) model as a predictor of survival benefit and posttransplant survival in pediatric liver transplant recipients.小儿终末期肝病(PELD)模型作为小儿肝移植受者生存获益和移植后生存的预测指标。
Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar;12(3):475-80. doi: 10.1002/lt.20703.
6
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) system to allocate and to share livers: experience of two Italian centers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)系统用于肝脏分配与共享:两个意大利中心的经验
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1814-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.053.
7
Liver transplantation in the United States.美国的肝脏移植
Clin Transpl. 2005:17-28.
8
MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes.根据等待名单规模划分的肝移植受者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分:器官分配的影响及患者预后
JAMA. 2004 Apr 21;291(15):1871-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.15.1871.
9
The effects of Share 35 on the cost of liver transplantation.Share 35对肝移植成本的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2017 May;31(5). doi: 10.1111/ctr.12937. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
The impact of PELD on OPTN liver allocation: preliminary results.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术对器官共享联合网络肝脏分配的影响:初步结果
Clin Transpl. 2003:13-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Survival for Adult Organ Transplantation.成人器官移植的生存趋势。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Feb 22;5(1):e383. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000383. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines on liver transplantation.亚太肝病学会肝脏移植临床实践指南。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Apr;18(2):299-383. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10629-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
3
Inactive status is an independent predictor of liver transplant waitlist mortality and is associated with a transplant centers median meld at transplant.
处于非活动状态是肝移植候补者死亡的独立预测因子,且与移植中心在移植时的中位 meld 相关。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260000. eCollection 2021.
4
Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Perioperative Management and Mortality in Liver Transplantation Recipients.分享 35 政策对肝移植受者围手术期管理和死亡率的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2021 Oct 29;26:e932895. doi: 10.12659/AOT.932895.
5
Predictors of Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With the Highest Acuity (MELD ≥40).最高紧急程度(MELD≥40)患者肝移植后的生存率预测因素。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):458-466. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004211.
6
Development of a Korean Liver Allocation System using Model for End Stage Liver Disease Scores: A Nationwide, Multicenter study.应用终末期肝脏疾病评分模型开发韩国肝脏分配系统:一项全国性、多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 16;9(1):7495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43965-2.
7
Outcomes After Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Intersection of Travel Distance and Hospital Volume.肝细胞癌切除术后的结果:旅行距离与医院容量的交集。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Jul;23(7):1425-1434. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04233-w. Epub 2019 May 8.
8
Liver Allocation Policies in the USA: Past, Present, and the Future.美国的肝脏分配政策:过去、现在和未来。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Apr;64(4):985-992. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05549-y.
9
Geographic Disparity in Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Rates Following Share 35.分享 35 之后,死者供肝肝移植率的地域差异。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2113-2120. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002643.
10
Effect of broader geographic sharing of donor lungs on lung transplant waitlist outcomes.更广泛的供体肺地理共享对肺移植候补者结局的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):136-144. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 14.