Suppr超能文献

活动范围与颈部肌筋膜疼痛。

Range of motion and cervical myofascial pain.

作者信息

Wilke J, Niederer D, Fleckenstein J, Vogt L, Banzer W

机构信息

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Sports Sciences, Department Sports Medicine, Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, 60487 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Sports Sciences, Department Sports Medicine, Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, 60487 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Jan;20(1):52-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

Abstract

Several studies investigating myofascial pain syndrome include assessments of range of motion (ROM) as a diagnostic criterion. However, the value of ROM in this context has not yet been evaluated in controlled clinical studies. We aimed to examine whether patients with myofascial pain syndrome display alterations of ROM when compared to healthy subjects. Twenty-two individuals (13 females, 9 males; aged 33.4 ± 13.9 yrs) afflicted with active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle as well as 22 age and sex matched healthy controls were included. All subjects underwent an examination of maximal active cervical ROM in flexion/extension assessed by means of a 3D ultrasonic movement analysis system (30 Hz; Zebris CMS 70). In the patients group, pressure pain threshold (PPT) of the trigger points was determined using a pressure algometer. Maximum range of motion in the sagittal plane did not differ between individuals with MTrP (125.9 ± 23.2°, 95% CI: 116.2-135.6°) and asymptomatic subjects (128.2 ± 20.4°, 95% CI: 119.7-136.7°; p > .05). In patients, PPT (1.7 ± .6, 95% CI: 1.5-1.9) was not correlated with cervical mobility (r = -.13; p > .05). Based on these pilot data, range of motion in flexion/extension is not a valid criterion for the detection of myofascial trigger points. Additional research incorporating movement amplitudes in other anatomical planes and additional afflicted muscles should be conducted in order to further delineate the relative impact of MTrP on range of motion.

摘要

多项调查肌筋膜疼痛综合征的研究将活动范围(ROM)评估作为一项诊断标准。然而,在对照临床研究中尚未评估ROM在此背景下的价值。我们旨在研究与健康受试者相比,肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者是否存在ROM改变。纳入了22名个体(13名女性,9名男性;年龄33.4±13.9岁),他们的上斜方肌有活跃的肌筋膜触发点,以及22名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者。所有受试者均通过3D超声运动分析系统(30Hz;Zebris CMS 70)接受最大主动颈椎屈伸ROM检查。在患者组中,使用压力痛觉计测定触发点的压力痛阈(PPT)。患有肌筋膜触发点(MTrP)的个体(125.9±23.2°,95%置信区间:116.2 - 135.6°)与无症状受试者(128.2±20.4°,95%置信区间:119.7 - 136.7°;p>.05)在矢状面的最大活动范围无差异。在患者中,PPT(1.7±.6,95%置信区间:1.5 - 1.9)与颈椎活动度无相关性(r = -.13;p>.05)。基于这些初步数据,屈伸活动范围不是检测肌筋膜触发点的有效标准。应开展纳入其他解剖平面运动幅度以及更多受累肌肉的进一步研究,以进一步阐明MTrP对活动范围的相对影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验