Xia Peng, Wang Xiaoju, Lin Qiang, Cheng Kai, Li Xueping
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2017 Mar 7;10:545-555. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S131482. eCollection 2017.
The objective of this review was to assess the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (US) on myofascial pain syndrome (MPS).
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to find relevant studies from January 1966 to May 2016 using keywords. Four investigators performed the data extraction.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the outcomes of pain and physical function between MPS patients receiving and not receiving US were selected by two researchers independently.
Data were extracted from the RCTs. Risk of bias and study quality were evaluated following the recommendations of Cochrane Collaboration. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
A total of 10 studies involving 428 MPS patients were included. US therapy significantly reduced pain intensity (SMD [CI]=-1.41 [-2.15, -0.67], =0.0002) and increased pain threshold (SMD [CI]=1.08 [0.55, 1.60], <0.0001), but had no significant effect on cervical range of motion (ROM) of lateral flexion (SMD [CI]=0.40 [-0.19, 0.99], =0.19), rotation (SMD [CI]=0.10 [-0.33, 0.52], =0.66), or extension or flexion (SMD [CI]=0.16 [-0.35, 0.68], =0.53). Heterogeneity between studies was mainly attributed to differences in the follow-up time, parameter of US, course of treatment, and the control group. The overall risk of bias from the included studies was high, and the evidence proving these effect calculations were assessed as low quality.
Owing to the high risk of bias and the across-trial heterogeneity of the studies, the current evidence is not clear enough to support US as an effective method to treat MPS. Clinical trials with methodological rigorousness and adequate power are needed to confirm it in the future.
本综述的目的是评估超声(US)对肌筋膜疼痛综合征(MPS)的治疗效果。
检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以使用关键词查找1966年1月至2016年5月的相关研究。四名研究人员进行了数据提取。
两名研究人员独立选择了随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验调查了接受和未接受US的MPS患者之间的疼痛和身体功能结果。
从RCT中提取数据。根据Cochrane协作网的建议评估偏倚风险和研究质量。计算标准化均数差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入10项涉及428例MPS患者的研究。US治疗显著降低了疼痛强度(SMD[CI]=-1.41[-2.15,-0.67],P=0.0002)并提高了疼痛阈值(SMD[CI]=1.08[0.55,1.60],P<0.0001),但对颈椎侧屈活动度(ROM)(SMD[CI]=0.40[-0.19,0.99],P=0.19)、旋转(SMD[CI]=0.10[-0.33,0.52],P=0.66)或伸展或屈曲(SMD[CI]=0.16[-0.3