Azzalini Lorenzo, Millán Xavier, Khan Razi, Couture Philippe, Ducharme Anique, Basmadjian Arsène, Bonan Raoul, Asgar Anita W
Department of Medicine, Interventional Cardiology and Echocardiography, Montreal Heart Institute, Université De Montréal, Montréal, Qubec, Canada.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec;88(7):1124-1133. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26460. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
To evaluate the impact of baseline left ventricular (LV) function on the clinical outcomes of patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) treated with MitraClip.
It is unknown whether patients with significant FMR and severe LV dysfunction benefit from MitraClip.
A cohort of 77 patients with significant FMR undergoing MitraClip procedure between December 2010 and January 2015 was categorized by baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) into tertiles: LVEF <27% (n = 27), LVEF 27-37% (n = 25), and LVEF >37% (n = 25). We sought to evaluate the impact of LVEF on all-cause mortality at follow-up.
There were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities, medical treatment and MR severity among tertiles of LVEF. Overall procedural success was 94%, with no differences among groups (LVEF <27%: 89%; LVEF 27-37%: 100%; LVEF >37%: 92%; P = 0.25). Median follow-up was 372 days (interquartile range: 128-627 days). MR severity improved in all three groups, as compared to baseline. There were no differences in the prevalence of MR ≤2+ on follow-up (P = 0.40). Mortality was highest in patients with LVEF <27% (41%), as compared with LVEF 27-37% (16%) and LVEF >37% (4%), P = 0.004. Patient who died had a lower baseline LVEF compared to those who survived (24.8 ± 7.7% versus 35.5 ± 13.7%, P < 0.001). An LVEF <27% was an independent predictor of mortality after adjusting for procedural success: hazard ratio 3.4 (95% CI: 1.1 to 10.0; P = 0.030).
MitraClip is effective in FMR patients regardless of the severity of LV dysfunction. However, low baseline LVEF is associated with increased mortality, despite procedural success. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
评估基线左心室(LV)功能对接受MitraClip治疗的功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)患者临床结局的影响。
严重FMR和严重LV功能障碍患者是否能从MitraClip治疗中获益尚不清楚。
对2010年12月至2015年1月期间接受MitraClip手术的77例严重FMR患者,根据基线LV射血分数(LVEF)分为三分位数:LVEF<27%(n = 27),LVEF 27 - 37%(n = 25),LVEF>37%(n = 25)。我们试图评估LVEF对随访期间全因死亡率的影响。
LVEF三分位数组间在基线合并症、药物治疗和MR严重程度方面无显著差异。总体手术成功率为94%,各组间无差异(LVEF<27%:89%;LVEF 27 - 37%:100%;LVEF>37%:92%;P = 0.25)。中位随访时间为372天(四分位间距:128 - 627天)。与基线相比,三组的MR严重程度均有所改善。随访时MR≤2+的患病率无差异(P = 0.40)。LVEF<27%的患者死亡率最高(41%),而LVEF 27 - 37%的患者死亡率为16%,LVEF>37% 的患者死亡率为4%,P = 0.004。死亡患者的基线LVEF低于存活患者(24.8±7.7%对35.5±13.7%,P<0.001)。在校正手术成功率后,LVEF<27%是死亡率的独立预测因素:风险比3.4(95%CI:1.1至10.0;P = 0.030)。
无论LV功能障碍的严重程度如何,MitraClip对FMR患者均有效。然而,尽管手术成功,但基线LVEF较低与死亡率增加相关。©2016威利期刊公司