Olsson Lars, Nilsson Mats, Svenson Björn, Hellén-Halme Kristina
1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
2 Department of Oral Radiology, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(4):20150402. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150402. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
Radiographic images suffer from varying amounts of noise. The most studied and discussed of these is random noise. However, recent research has shown that the projected anatomy contributes substantially to noise, especially when detecting low-contrast objects in the images. Our aim, therefore, was to evaluate the extent to which overprojected anatomical noise affects the detection of low-contrast objects in intra-oral images.
Our study used four common sensor models. With each sensor, we took four series of images, three series with and one series without an anatomical phantom present. In each series, we exposed a low-contrast phantom at 18 different exposure times using a standardized method. 4 observers evaluated all 288 images.
The low-contrast characteristics differed substantially when imaging low contrast on a homogeneous background compared with imaging low contrast when an anatomical phantom was present. For three of the sensors, optimal exposure times for low-contrast imaging were found, while the fourth sensor displayed a completely different behaviour.
Calibrating the low-contrast properties of an imaging system using low-contrast objects on a homogeneous background is not recommended. On an anatomical background, low-contrast properties are completely different, and these will mimic the clinical situation much more closely, directing the operator how to best use the system. There is a clear demand for further research on this subject.
放射影像存在不同程度的噪声。其中研究和讨论最多的是随机噪声。然而,最近的研究表明,投影的解剖结构对噪声有很大影响,尤其是在检测图像中的低对比度物体时。因此,我们的目的是评估过度投影的解剖噪声在多大程度上影响口腔内图像中低对比度物体的检测。
我们的研究使用了四种常见的传感器模型。对于每个传感器,我们拍摄了四组图像,其中三组有解剖模型,一组没有解剖模型。在每组图像中,我们使用标准化方法在18个不同的曝光时间曝光一个低对比度模型。4名观察者评估了所有288张图像。
与存在解剖模型时成像低对比度相比,在均匀背景上成像低对比度时,低对比度特征有很大差异。对于其中三个传感器,找到了低对比度成像的最佳曝光时间,而第四个传感器表现出完全不同的行为。
不建议使用均匀背景上的低对比度物体来校准成像系统的低对比度特性。在解剖背景下,低对比度特性完全不同,并且这些特性将更紧密地模拟临床情况,指导操作人员如何最佳地使用该系统。显然需要对该主题进行进一步研究。