Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁与卡马西平治疗三叉神经痛的疗效与安全性:一项荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of Gabapentin vs. Carbamazepine in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Yuan Min, Zhou Huang-Yan, Xiao Zhi-Long, Wang Wei, Li Xue-Li, Chen Shen-Jian, Yin Xiao-Ping, Xu Li-Jun

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Department of Immunology and Pathogenic Biology, The Basic Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Pain Pract. 2016 Nov;16(8):1083-1091. doi: 10.1111/papr.12406. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gabapentin in comparison with carbamazepine in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed study quality, and extracted data. Sixteen randomized controlled trials that included 1,331 patients were assessed. The meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate of gabapentin therapy group was similar with carbamazepine therapy group (OR = 1.600, 95% CI 1.185, 2.161, P = 0.002). While the effective rate of gabapentin therapy for 4 weeks was higher than that of carbamazepine therapy (OR = 1.495, 95% CI 1.061, 2.107, P = 0.022, heterogeneity: x = 7.12, P = 0.625, I = 0.0%), the life satisfaction improvement is also better in the gabapentin therapy group after a 4-week treatment (SMD = 0.966, 95% CI 0.583, 1.348, P < 0.001). Furthermore, our meta-analysis suggested that the adverse reaction rate of gabapentin therapy group was significantly lower than that of carbamazepine therapy group (OR = 0.312, 95% CI 0.240, 0.407, P < 0.001). In conclusion, present trials comparing gabapentin with carbamazepine are all poor in terms of methodological quality. Based on the available evidence, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the efficacy and side effects of gabapentin being superior to carbamazepine.

摘要

为了评估加巴喷丁与卡马西平治疗三叉神经痛的安全性和疗效,进行了一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。两名评价者独立选择研究、评估研究质量并提取数据。共评估了16项随机对照试验,纳入1331例患者。荟萃分析表明,加巴喷丁治疗组的总有效率与卡马西平治疗组相似(OR = 1.600,95%CI 1.185,2.161,P = 0.002)。虽然加巴喷丁治疗4周的有效率高于卡马西平治疗(OR = 1.495,95%CI 1.061,2.107,P = 0.022,异质性:x = 7.12,P = 0.625,I² = 0.0%),但加巴喷丁治疗组在4周治疗后生活满意度改善也更好(SMD = 0.966,95%CI 0.583,1.348,P < 0.001)。此外,我们的荟萃分析表明,加巴喷丁治疗组的不良反应发生率显著低于卡马西平治疗组(OR = 0.312,95%CI 0.240,0.407,P < 0.001)。总之,目前比较加巴喷丁与卡马西平的试验在方法学质量方面都较差。基于现有证据,无法得出加巴喷丁在疗效和副作用方面优于卡马西平的结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验