Zhao Xin, Ge Shuyu
Department of Pharmacy, Beilun People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2023 May 2;14:1045640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1045640. eCollection 2023.
Drug therapy is the most commonly used treatment for primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN), in which carbamazepine is the first-line drug. Recently, the anti-epileptic drug gabapentin has also been widely used in patients with PTN, but whether it can be used as a substitute for carbamazepine still needs to be verified. Our study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of gabapentin vs. carbamazepine as a treatment for PTN.
We searched seven electronic databases for studies published as of 31 July 2022. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of gabapentin vs. carbamazepine on patients with PTN that met the inclusion criteria were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using Revman 5.4 and Stata 14.0, in which forest plots, funnel plots, and sensitivity analysis were performed. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for the measurement indicators of continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
A total of 18 RCTs with 1,604 patients were eventually identified. The meta-analysis showed that compared with the carbamazepine group, the gabapentin group significantly improved the effective rate (OR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.62, < 0.001), reduced the adverse event rate (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.37, < 0.001), and improved the visual analog scale (VAS) score (MD = -0.46, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.06, = 0.03). Although the funnel plot showed evidence of publication bias, the sensitivity analysis revealed the stability of the results.
The current evidence showed that gabapentin may be superior to carbamazepine in relation to efficacy and safety in patients with PTN. It is crucial that more RCTs are conducted to confirm the conclusion in the future.
药物治疗是原发性三叉神经痛(PTN)最常用的治疗方法,其中卡马西平是一线药物。近年来,抗癫痫药物加巴喷丁也被广泛应用于PTN患者,但它是否可替代卡马西平仍有待验证。本研究旨在评估加巴喷丁与卡马西平治疗PTN的安全性和有效性。
检索截至2022年7月31日发表的研究的七个电子数据库。纳入所有符合纳入标准的加巴喷丁与卡马西平治疗PTN患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Revman 5.4和Stata 14.0进行荟萃分析,绘制森林图、漏斗图并进行敏感性分析。连续变量和分类变量的测量指标分别采用95%置信区间(CI)的均值差(MD)和比值比(OR)。
最终纳入18项RCT,共1604例患者。荟萃分析显示,与卡马西平组相比,加巴喷丁组有效率显著提高(OR = 2.02,95% CI 1.56至2.62,<0.001),不良事件发生率降低(OR = 0.28,95% CI 0.21至0.37,<0.001),视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分改善(MD = -0.46,95% CI -0.86至-0.06,= 0.03)。尽管漏斗图显示存在发表偏倚的证据,但敏感性分析表明结果具有稳定性。
当前证据表明,在PTN患者中,加巴喷丁在疗效和安全性方面可能优于卡马西平。未来开展更多RCT以证实该结论至关重要。