Suppr超能文献

肝硬化患者的腹腔镜肝切除术:调整技术则安全。

Laparoscopic hepatectomy in cirrhotics: safe if you adjust technique.

作者信息

Worhunsky David J, Dua Monica M, Tran Thuy B, Siu Bernard, Poultsides George A, Norton Jeffrey A, Visser Brendan C

机构信息

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Suite H3680C, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4307-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4748-6. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive liver surgery is a growing field, and a small number of recent reports have suggested that laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is feasible even in patients with cirrhosis. However, parenchymal transection of the cirrhotic liver is challenging due to fibrosis and portal hypertension. There is a paucity of data regarding the technical modifications necessary to safely transect the diseased parenchyma.

METHODS

Patients undergoing LLR by a single surgeon between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients with cirrhosis were compared to those without cirrhosis to examine differences in surgical technique, intraoperative characteristics, and outcomes (including liver-related morbidity and general postoperative complication rates).

RESULTS

A total of 167 patients underwent LLR during the study period. Forty-eight (29 %) had cirrhosis, of which 43 (90 %) had hepatitis C. Most had Child-Pugh class A disease (85 %). Compared to noncirrhotics, patients with cirrhosis were older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma. Precoagulation before parenchymal transection was used more frequently in cirrhotics (65 vs. 15 %, P < 0.001), and mean portal triad clamping time was longer (32 vs. 22 min, P = 0.002). There were few conversions to open surgery, though hand-assisted laparoscopy was used as an alternative to converting to open in three patients with cirrhosis. Blood loss was relatively low for both groups. Although there were more postoperative complications among cirrhotics (38 vs. 13 %, P = 0.001), this was almost entirely due to a higher rate of minor (Clavien-Dindo I or II) complications. Liver-related morbidity, major complications, and mortality rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR is safe for selected patients with cirrhosis. The added complexity associated with the division of diseased liver parenchyma may be overcome with some form of technique modification, including more liberal use of precoagulation, portal triad clamping, or a hand-assist port.

摘要

背景

微创肝脏手术是一个不断发展的领域,最近少数报告表明,即使是肝硬化患者,腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)也是可行的。然而,由于纤维化和门静脉高压,肝硬化肝脏的实质横断具有挑战性。关于安全横断病变实质所需的技术改进的数据很少。

方法

回顾了2008年至2015年间由单一外科医生进行LLR的患者。将肝硬化患者与非肝硬化患者进行比较,以检查手术技术、术中特征和结果(包括肝脏相关发病率和一般术后并发症发生率)的差异。

结果

在研究期间,共有167例患者接受了LLR。48例(29%)患有肝硬化,其中43例(90%)患有丙型肝炎。大多数为Child-Pugh A级疾病(85%)。与非肝硬化患者相比,肝硬化患者年龄更大,合并症更多,更有可能患有肝细胞癌。肝硬化患者在实质横断前更频繁地使用预凝(65%对15%,P<0.001),平均门静脉三联征夹闭时间更长(32分钟对22分钟,P=0.002)。很少有转为开放手术的情况,不过在3例肝硬化患者中,手辅助腹腔镜被用作替代转为开放手术的方法。两组的失血量都相对较低。虽然肝硬化患者术后并发症更多(38%对13%,P=0.001),但这几乎完全是由于轻微(Clavien-Dindo I或II)并发症发生率较高。肝脏相关发病率、主要并发症和死亡率相似。

结论

对于选定的肝硬化患者,LLR是安全的。通过某种形式的技术改进,包括更广泛地使用预凝、门静脉三联征夹闭或手辅助端口,可以克服与病变肝实质分割相关的额外复杂性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验