Toniolo Alexandra do Rosário, Ribeiro Maíra Marques, Ishii Marina, da Silva Cely Barreto, Jenné Mimica Lycia Mara, Graziano Kazuko Uchikawa
School of Nursing University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
School of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil; University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Am J Infect Control. 2016 Jun 1;44(6):719-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.12.035. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of manual and automated dialyzer reprocessing. Dialyzers were filled with fluid thioglycollate medium from blood and dialysate chambers after being reprocessed and chemically sterilized with 0.2% peracetic acid. They were incubated for 14 days at 35°C ± 2°C, and microbiologic analysis was performed. Microorganisms were identified in 3 of the 11 samples (27.3%) from the blood chambers: Sphingomonas paucimobilis (2/3) and Penicillium spp (1/3) and in 11 of the 11 samples (100%) from the dialysate chambers: S paucimobilis (7/11), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (4/11), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (3/11), Candida spp (1/11), and Acinetobacter baumannii (1/11). Of the 4 manually reprocessed dialyzers, gram-positive bacillus were identified in 1 sample (25%) from the blood chamber, and Bacillus spp and Burkholderia spp were identified in 1 sample (25%) from the dialysate chamber. The dialyzers reprocessing can pose risks safety because of exposure patient to microorganisms.