Edens Chris, Wong Jacklyn, Lyman Meghan, Rizzo Kyle, Nguyen Duc, Blain Michela, Horwich-Scholefield Sam, Moulton-Meissner Heather, Epson Erin, Rosenberg Jon, Patel Priti R
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Jun;69(6):726-733. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.022. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
Clusters of bloodstream infections caused by Burkholderia cepacia and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are uncommon, but have been previously identified in hemodialysis centers that reprocessed dialyzers for reuse on patients. We investigated an outbreak of bloodstream infections caused by B cepacia and S maltophilia among hemodialysis patients in clinics of a dialysis organization.
Outbreak investigation, including matched case-control study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Hemodialysis patients treated in multiple outpatient clinics owned by a dialysis organization.
Main predictors were dialyzer reuse, dialyzer model, and dialyzer reprocessing practice.
Case patients had a bloodstream infection caused by B cepacia or S maltophilia; controls were patients without infection dialyzed at the same clinic on the same day as a case; results of environmental cultures and organism typing.
17 cases (9 B cepacia and 8 S maltophilia bloodstream infections) occurred in 5 clinics owned by the same dialysis organization. Case patients were more likely to have received hemodialysis with a dialyzer that had been used more than 6 times (matched OR, 7.03; 95% CI, 1.38-69.76) and to have been dialyzed with a specific reusable dialyzer (Model R) with sealed ends (OR, 22.87; 95% CI, 4.49-∞). No major lapses during dialyzer reprocessing were identified that could explain the outbreak. B cepacia was isolated from samples collected from a dialyzer header-cleaning machine from a clinic with cases and was indistinguishable from a patient isolate collected from the same clinic, by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from 2 reused Model R dialyzers that had undergone the facility's reprocessing procedure.
Limited statistical power and overmatching; few patient isolates and dialyzers available for testing.
This outbreak was likely caused by contamination during reprocessing of reused dialyzers. Results of this and previous investigations demonstrate that exposing patients to reused dialyzers increases the risk for bloodstream infections. To reduce infection risk, providers should consider implementing single dialyzer use whenever possible.
由洋葱伯克霍尔德菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的血流感染群并不常见,但此前在对透析器进行再处理以供患者重复使用的血液透析中心已被发现。我们调查了一家透析机构各诊所的血液透析患者中由洋葱伯克霍尔德菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的血流感染暴发情况。
暴发调查,包括匹配病例对照研究。
在一家透析机构所属的多个门诊诊所接受治疗的血液透析患者。
主要预测因素为透析器重复使用、透析器型号和透析器再处理操作。
病例患者发生了由洋葱伯克霍尔德菌或嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的血流感染;对照为与病例在同一天在同一诊所接受透析且未感染的患者;环境培养结果和菌株分型。
在同一透析机构所属的5家诊所发生了17例感染(9例洋葱伯克霍尔德菌血流感染和8例嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌血流感染)。病例患者更有可能接受过使用超过6次的透析器进行的血液透析(匹配比值比,7.03;95%可信区间,1.38 - 69.76),并且更有可能使用过带有密封端的特定可重复使用透析器(R型)进行透析(比值比,22.87;95%可信区间,4.49 - ∞)。在透析器再处理过程中未发现可解释此次暴发的重大失误。通过脉冲场凝胶电泳,从出现病例的一家诊所的透析器头部清洗机采集的样本中分离出的洋葱伯克霍尔德菌与从同一诊所采集的患者分离株无法区分。从2个经过该机构再处理程序的重复使用的R型透析器中分离出革兰氏阴性菌。
统计效能有限且过度匹配;可供检测的患者分离株和透析器数量很少。
此次暴发可能是由重复使用的透析器再处理过程中的污染所致。本次及之前的调查结果表明,让患者接触重复使用的透析器会增加血流感染风险。为降低感染风险,医疗机构应尽可能考虑采用一次性透析器。