Befort Christie A, VanWormer Jeffrey J, DeSouza Cyrus, Ellerbeck Edward F, Kimminau Kim S, Greiner Allen, Gajewski Byron, Huang Terry, Perri Michael G, Fazzino Tera L, Christifano Danielle, Eiland Leslie, Drincic Andjela
University of Kansas Medical Center, Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Kansas City, KS, 66160, United States.
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield, WI 54449, United States.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
Obesity disproportionately affects rural residents in the United States, and primary care has the potential to fill a major gap in the provision of weight management services for rural communities. The objective of this cluster-randomized pragmatic trial is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of three obesity treatment models in rural primary care: the Intensive Behavior Therapy fee-for-service (FFS) model reimbursed by Medicare, a team-based model that recognizes the patient-centered medical home (PCMH) as a preferred delivery approach, and the centralized disease management (DM) model, in which phone-based counseling is provided outside of the primary care practice. We hypothesize that the PCMH and DM treatments will be more effective than FFS in reducing weight at 24 months. Thirty-six practices from the rural Midwestern U.S. are randomized to deliver one of the three interventions to 40 patients (N=1440) age 20 to 75 with a BMI 30-45 kg/m(2). In the FFS arm, primary care providers and their personnel counsel patients to follow evidence-based weight loss guidelines using the Medicare-designated treatment schedule. In the PCMH arm, patients receive a comprehensive weight management intervention delivered locally by practice personnel using a combination of in-person and phone-based group sessions. In the DM arm, the same intervention is delivered remotely by obesity treatment specialists via group conference calls. The primary outcome is weight loss at 24 months. Additional measures include fasting glucose, lipids, quality of life indicators, and implementation process measures. Findings will illuminate effective obesity treatment intervention(s) in rural primary care.
肥胖对美国农村居民的影响尤为严重,而初级保健有潜力填补农村社区体重管理服务提供方面的重大缺口。这项整群随机实用试验的目的是评估农村初级保健中三种肥胖治疗模式的相对有效性:由医疗保险报销的强化行为疗法按服务收费(FFS)模式、一种将以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)视为首选提供方式的团队模式,以及集中式疾病管理(DM)模式,即在初级保健机构之外提供基于电话的咨询服务。我们假设,在24个月时,PCMH和DM治疗在减轻体重方面将比FFS更有效。来自美国中西部农村地区的36家医疗机构被随机分配,为40名年龄在20至75岁、体重指数(BMI)为30 - 45 kg/m²的患者(N = 1440)提供三种干预措施中的一种。在FFS组中,初级保健提供者及其工作人员根据医疗保险指定的治疗时间表,建议患者遵循循证减肥指南。在PCMH组中,患者接受由医疗机构工作人员在当地提供的全面体重管理干预,采用面对面和基于电话的小组会议相结合的方式。在DM组中,由肥胖治疗专家通过小组电话会议远程提供相同的干预措施。主要结局是24个月时的体重减轻。其他指标包括空腹血糖、血脂、生活质量指标以及实施过程指标。研究结果将阐明农村初级保健中有效的肥胖治疗干预措施。