• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一年记录

Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy a one year record.

作者信息

Di Bartolomeo Nicola, Mascioli Federico, Ciampaglia Franco

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2015;86:528-31.

PMID:26899137
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our study is to demonstrate the feasibility and the safety of the Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

MATERIAL OF STUDY

During one year period 12 patients underwent 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 102 patientunderwent Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. In this study the exclusion criteria for surgery have been analyzed as well as the technical difficulties, the operation time, the duration of hospital stay, the post-surgery pain, the complications and the aesthetic results

RESULTS

The operation time was 3 minutes longer for Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, the hospital stay was shorter in Mini-laparoscopic group. Patients that underwent 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy required a longer analgesic therapy. Complications occurred during the study were not related to the method. The aesthetic results were better in Minilaparoscopic Cholecystectomy due to lower scars length. Only in two cases we converted the planned Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

DISCUSSION

All the patients submitted to Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and 5mm Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy had the same therapeutic result. The Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy gave advantages on post-surgery pain and recovery time.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience the Mini-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is a safe method that guarantees the same clinical results of conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. It shows some technical difficulties, but yet this surgery is to be recommended to expert surgeons.

KEY WORDS

Gallbladder Polyps, Gallstone Disease, Mini-laparoscopic Cholecistecomy.

摘要

目的

我们的研究旨在证明迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性和安全性。

研究材料

在一年时间里,12例患者接受了5毫米腹腔镜胆囊切除术,102例患者接受了迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术。本研究分析了手术的排除标准以及技术难度、手术时间、住院时间、术后疼痛、并发症和美观效果。

结果

迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术时间长3分钟,迷你腹腔镜组的住院时间较短。接受5毫米腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者需要更长时间的镇痛治疗。研究期间发生的并发症与手术方法无关。由于疤痕长度较短,迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的美观效果更好。仅在两例病例中,我们将计划中的迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术改为5毫米腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

讨论

所有接受迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术和5毫米腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者都有相同的治疗效果。迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术在术后疼痛和恢复时间方面具有优势。

结论

根据我们的经验,迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种安全的方法,能保证与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术相同的临床效果。它存在一些技术难点,但仍推荐给专业外科医生。

关键词

胆囊息肉、胆结石病、迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术

相似文献

1
Minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy a one year record.迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一年记录
Ann Ital Chir. 2015;86:528-31.
2
Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.越小就一定越好吗?一项比较迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术和传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者预后影响的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2541-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0055-1. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
3
Combined use of mini-laparoscope and conventional laparoscope in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preservation of minimal invasiveness.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜联合用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术:保持微创性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999 Feb;9(1):57-62. doi: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.57.
4
Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a preliminary study in 37 patients with gallbladder disease.单孔经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术:37例胆囊疾病患者的初步研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Aug;19(4):495-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2008.0424.
5
Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项对比研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):1017-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.1017.
6
From multi-incision to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy step-by-step: one surgeon's self-taught experience and retrospective analysis.从多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术到单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一位外科医生的自学经验和回顾性分析。
Asian J Surg. 2013 Jan;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
7
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087.
8
Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul-Sep;26(3):149-51.
9
Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Apr;17(2):191-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0051.
10
Needlescopic clipless cholecystectomy as an efficient, safe, and cost-effective alternative with diminutive scars: the first 1000 cases.针状腹腔镜无夹胆囊切除术作为一种高效、安全且经济有效的替代方法,具有微小疤痕:首例1000例病例。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009 Oct;19(5):368-72. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181b7d3c7.