• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验。

Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Gupta Aman, Shrivastava U K, Kumar Praveen, Burman Deepa

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences, Guru Teg, Bahadur Hospital, Delhi 110095.

出版信息

Trop Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul-Sep;26(3):149-51.

PMID:16512468
Abstract

Since its introduction in 1987, the technique of cholecystectomy has continued to undergo evolution. Surgeons have reduced the port size and number or both to achieve improvement in postoperative pain control, rapid return to activity and better cosmetic results. Therefore, this study was done to compare the standard 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with the 3 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a 5 mm telescope instead of 10 mm telescope (mini laparoscopic cholecystectomy - MLC). Forty patients were randomised to each group. Mean operating time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, mean period to resume walking, eating and return to normal activities and mean hospital stay were similar in the two groups. The level of postoperative pain was significantly lower in the MLC group. Patients who underwent MLC required a significantly lower dose of analgesics. In conclusion mini laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure with less postoperative pain and better cosmesis and without increased complications.

摘要

自1987年引入以来,胆囊切除术技术一直在不断发展。外科医生减小了端口尺寸或数量,或两者同时减小,以改善术后疼痛控制、更快恢复活动能力并获得更好的美容效果。因此,本研究旨在比较标准的四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)与使用5毫米望远镜而非10毫米望远镜的三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术 - MLC)。每组随机分配40名患者。两组的平均手术时间、术中及术后并发症、恢复行走、进食和恢复正常活动的平均时间以及平均住院时间相似。MLC组术后疼痛程度明显较低。接受MLC的患者所需镇痛药剂量明显较低。总之,迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术是一种可行且安全的手术,术后疼痛较轻,美容效果更好,且并发症没有增加。

相似文献

1
Minilaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项随机对照试验。
Trop Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul-Sep;26(3):149-51.
2
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments.使用微型器械进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2003 Nov;90(11):1345-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4315.
3
Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项对比研究。
Arch Surg. 2003 Sep;138(9):1017-23. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.9.1017.
4
Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的优势:一项前瞻性随机试验的结果
Arch Surg. 2005 Dec;140(12):1178-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.12.1178.
5
Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy.迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术对比
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):614-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000316. Epub 2000 Mar 13.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using glove port in comparison with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy SILC using glove port.使用手套端口的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与使用手套端口的标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较 单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术使用手套端口
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318242e12a.
7
Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jul;97(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7087.
8
[Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: indications, technique and results].
Ann Ital Chir. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):51-5.
9
Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
10
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with mini-instruments. Technique and initial experiences].[使用微型器械的腹腔镜胆囊切除术。技术与初步经验]
Zentralbl Chir. 1999;124(8):749-53.

引用本文的文献

1
5 mm versus 10 mm umbilical port during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: do outcomes justify broader use in obese patients? A randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中5毫米与10毫米脐部端口的比较:肥胖患者中更广泛使用的结果是否合理?一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12016-5.
2
Identification and categorisation of relevant outcomes for symptomatic uncomplicated gallstone disease: in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set.有症状非复杂性胆结石疾病相关结局的识别与分类:为制定核心结局集提供信息的深入分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 24;11(6):e045568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045568.
3
Is mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy any better than the gold standard?: A comparative study.
迷你腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否比金标准更好?一项比较研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jan-Mar;13(1):42-46. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181368.
4
Low-Friction Minilaparoscopy Outperforms Regular 5-mm and 3-mm Instruments for Precise Tasks.低摩擦微型腹腔镜在精确任务方面优于常规的5毫米和3毫米器械。
JSLS. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00067.
5
Evaluation of invasiveness in single-site laparoscopic colectomy, using "the PainVision™ system" for quantitative analysis of pain sensation.使用“PainVision™系统”对单部位腹腔镜结肠切除术的侵袭性进行评估,以对疼痛感觉进行定量分析。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3216-23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3594-7. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
6
The efficacy and safety of different kinds of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a network meta analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials.不同类型腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效与安全性:43项随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e90313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090313. eCollection 2014.
7
Fewer-than-four ports versus four ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:少于四个端口与四个端口的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 20;2014(2):CD007109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007109.pub2.
8
A comparison of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: from the diagnosis to the hospital cost.经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:从诊断到住院费用
J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Aug;85(2):68-74. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.2.68. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
9
Miniports versus standard ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术的微型端口与标准端口对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 1;2013(8):CD006804. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006804.pub3.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a preliminary experience.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:初步经验。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1861-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0860-1. Epub 2010 Jan 28.