Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht,The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine,Atlanta, GA, USA.
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.031. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Inhibitory control, like most cognitive processes, is subject to an age-related decline. The effect of age on neurofunctional inhibition processing remains uncertain, with age-related increases as well as decreases in activation being reported. This is possibly because reactive (i.e., outright stopping) and proactive inhibition (i.e., anticipation of stopping) have not been evaluated separately. Here, we investigate the effects of aging on reactive as well as proactive inhibition, using functional MRI in 73 healthy subjects aged 30-70years. We found reactive inhibition to slow down with advancing age, which was paralleled by increased activation in the motor cortex. Behaviorally, older adults did not exercise increased proactive inhibition strategies compared to younger adults. However, the pattern of activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) showed a clear age-effect on proactive inhibition: rather than flexibly engaging the rIFG in response to varying stop-signal probabilities, older subjects showed an overall hyperactivation. Whole-brain analyses revealed similar hyperactivations in various other frontal and parietal brain regions. These results are in line with the neural compensation hypothesis of aging: processing becomes less flexible and efficient with advancing age, which is compensated for by overall enhanced activation. Moreover, by disentangling reactive and proactive inhibition, we can show for the first time that the age-related increase in activation during inhibition that is reported generally by prior studies may be the result of compensation for reduced neural flexibility related to proactive control strategies.
抑制控制,如同大多数认知过程一样,会随着年龄的增长而衰退。年龄对神经功能抑制处理的影响尚不确定,有研究报道称,大脑的激活会随着年龄的增长而增加或减少。这可能是因为反应性(即直接停止)和前摄性抑制(即预期停止)没有被分开评估。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像技术,对 73 名年龄在 30-70 岁之间的健康受试者进行了研究,以调查年龄对反应性和前摄性抑制的影响。我们发现,随着年龄的增长,反应性抑制会减缓,而运动皮层的激活会增加。行为上,与年轻成年人相比,年长的成年人并没有更多地使用前摄性抑制策略。然而,右额下回(rIFG)的激活模式在前摄性抑制方面表现出明显的年龄效应:年长的受试者并没有灵活地调动 rIFG 来应对不同的停止信号概率,而是表现出整体的过度激活。全脑分析显示,在其他各种额叶和顶叶脑区也存在类似的过度激活。这些结果与衰老的神经补偿假说一致:随着年龄的增长,处理过程变得不那么灵活和高效,这可以通过整体增强的激活来补偿。此外,通过区分反应性和前摄性抑制,我们首次可以证明,之前的研究普遍报道的抑制过程中与年龄相关的激活增加,可能是由于与前摄性控制策略相关的神经灵活性降低而导致的补偿结果。