Doshi Ankur M, Ream Justin M, Kierans Andrea S, Bilbily Matthew, Rusinek Henry, Huang William C, Chandarana Hersh
1 Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 First Ave, 3rd Fl, New York, NY 10016.
2 Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):566-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15004.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether qualitative and quantitative MRI feature analysis is useful for differentiating type 1 from type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC).
This retrospective study included 21 type 1 and 17 type 2 PRCCs evaluated with preoperative MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated various qualitative features, including signal intensity, heterogeneity, and margin. For the quantitative analysis, a radiology fellow and a medical student independently drew 3D volumes of interest over the entire tumor on T2-weighted HASTE images, apparent diffusion coefficient parametric maps, and nephrographic phase contrast-enhanced MR images to derive first-order texture metrics. Qualitative and quantitative features were compared between the groups.
For both readers, qualitative features with greater frequency in type 2 PRCC included heterogeneous enhancement, indistinct margin, and T2 heterogeneity (all, p < 0.035). Indistinct margins and heterogeneous enhancement were independent predictors (AUC, 0.822). Quantitative analysis revealed that apparent diffusion coefficient, HASTE, and contrast-enhanced entropy were greater in type 2 PRCC (p < 0.05; AUC, 0.682-0.716). A combined quantitative and qualitative model had an AUC of 0.859. Qualitative features within the model had interreader concordance of 84-95%, and the quantitative data had intraclass coefficients of 0.873-0.961.
Qualitative and quantitative features can help discriminate between type 1 and type 2 PRCC. Quantitative analysis may capture useful information that complements the qualitative appearance while benefiting from high interobserver agreement.
本研究旨在确定定性和定量MRI特征分析是否有助于鉴别1型和2型乳头状肾细胞癌(PRCC)。
本回顾性研究纳入了21例1型PRCC和17例2型PRCC,术前行MRI检查。两名放射科医生独立评估各种定性特征,包括信号强度、异质性和边界。对于定量分析,一名放射科住院医师和一名医学生在T2加权HASTE图像、表观扩散系数参数图和肾实质期对比增强MR图像上独立绘制整个肿瘤的三维感兴趣区,以得出一阶纹理指标。对两组之间的定性和定量特征进行比较。
对于两位阅片者,2型PRCC中出现频率更高的定性特征包括强化不均匀、边界不清和T2信号异质性(均p<0.035)。边界不清和强化不均匀是独立预测因素(AUC,0.822)。定量分析显示,2型PRCC的表观扩散系数、HASTE和对比增强熵更高(p<0.05;AUC,0.682 - 0.716)。定性和定量相结合的模型AUC为0.859。模型中的定性特征阅片者间一致性为84% - 95%,定量数据组内相关系数为0.873 - 0.961。
定性和定量特征有助于鉴别1型和2型PRCC。定量分析可能获取有用信息,在受益于高观察者间一致性的同时补充定性表现。