• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估青少年情绪意识的成分情绪方法。

A componential emotion approach for the assessment of emotional awareness in youth.

作者信息

Veirman Elke, Fontaine Johnny R J, Van Ryckeghem Dimitri M L

机构信息

Department of Personnel Management, Work and Organizational Psychology, Ghent University.

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1416-1426. doi: 10.1037/pas0000261. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1037/pas0000261
PMID:26901351
Abstract

The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale for Children (LEAS-C) is a performance-based instrument that assesses emotional awareness in the structure of written responses to a set of real-life scenarios. While it is theoretically expected that emotional awareness develops with age, virtually no age differences have been established with the LEAS-C. The present study investigated whether an adaptation of the instructions and scoring procedure on the basis of the componential emotion approach could improve the validity of the LEAS-C and reveal the theoretically expected age differences. An adapted LEAS-C was administered to a sample of 574 children and adolescents and scored with the original and a new componential scoring procedure. An acceptable reliability for the original and a good reliability and a high interrater reliability for the componential scoring procedure were observed. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses showed measurement invariance of factor loadings and intercepts across children (8 to 12 years) and adolescents (13 to 16 years) for all tested models, for both scoring procedures. A one-factor model fitted well for the total scores and self and other scores for both scoring procedures. The pattern of relationships with alexithymia, emotional intelligence, intelligence, personality, and social and emotional impairment as well as gender differences were comparable with prior research. Furthermore, the expected relationship with age was found, with stronger correlations for the componential than the original scoring procedure. In conclusion, analyses of the reliability, internal structure, and nomological network supported the adaptations of the LEAS-C on the basis of the componential emotion approach. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

儿童情绪觉察量表(LEAS-C)是一种基于表现的工具,通过对一系列现实生活场景的书面回答结构来评估情绪觉察能力。理论上预期情绪觉察能力会随着年龄增长而发展,但使用LEAS-C几乎未发现年龄差异。本研究调查了基于成分情绪方法对指导语和评分程序进行调整是否能提高LEAS-C的效度,并揭示理论上预期的年龄差异。对574名儿童和青少年样本施测了改编后的LEAS-C,并采用原始评分程序和新的成分评分程序进行评分。观察到原始评分程序具有可接受的信度,成分评分程序具有良好的信度和较高的评分者间信度。多组验证性因素分析表明,对于所有测试模型和两种评分程序,儿童(8至12岁)和青少年(13至16岁)的因素载荷和截距具有测量不变性。单因素模型对两种评分程序的总分、自我和他人得分拟合良好。与述情障碍、情商、智力、人格、社会和情绪障碍的关系模式以及性别差异与先前研究相当。此外,发现了与年龄的预期关系,成分评分程序的相关性比原始评分程序更强。总之,对信度、内部结构和法则网络的分析支持了基于成分情绪方法对LEAS-C的改编。(PsycINFO数据库记录

相似文献

1
A componential emotion approach for the assessment of emotional awareness in youth.一种用于评估青少年情绪意识的成分情绪方法。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1416-1426. doi: 10.1037/pas0000261. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
2
[French validation study of the levels of emotional awareness scale].[情绪觉察量表水平的法语验证研究]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):310-20.
3
Construct validity of the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale among women high in eating disorder symptoms: a cross-sectional study.进食障碍症状高的女性中情绪觉察水平量表的建构效度:一项横断面研究。
Eat Weight Disord. 2021 Jun;26(5):1653-1659. doi: 10.1007/s40519-020-00945-0. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Assessing alexithymia and emotional awareness: relations between measures in a German non-clinical sample.评估述情障碍和情绪意识:德国非临床样本中各项测量指标之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):952-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.12.013. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
5
The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale: a cognitive-developmental measure of emotion.情绪意识量表:一种情绪的认知发展测量工具。
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):124-34. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674052.
6
Computer Scoring of Emotional Awareness in a Nonclinical Population of Young Adults.计算机对年轻成年人非临床人群情绪意识的评分。
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jan-Feb;100(1):107-115. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1282866. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
7
Measuring emotional awareness from a cognitive-developmental perspective: Portuguese adaptation studies of the levels of emotional awareness scale.从认知发展角度测量情绪意识:情绪意识量表水平的葡萄牙语适应性研究
Acta Med Port. 2013 Mar-Apr;26(2):145-53. Epub 2013 May 31.
8
Development and validation of the Emotional Intelligence Test for Adolescents in a Chinese sample.《青少年情绪智力量表在中国样本中的编制与验证》。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Dec;33(12):1200-1214. doi: 10.1037/pas0001078.
9
Computer scoring of the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale.计算机对情绪意识量表的评分。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):586-95. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.586.
10
The German Version of the Emotion Awareness Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents: Associations with Emotion Regulation and Psychosocial Adjustment.儿童和青少年情绪意识问卷的德文版:与情绪调节和心理社会适应的关系。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Jul-Aug;101(4):434-445. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1492414. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Performing for Better Communication: Creativity, Cognitive-Emotional Skills and Embodied Language in Primary Schools.为了更好的沟通而表演:小学中的创造力、认知情感技能与身体语言
J Intell. 2023 Jul 14;11(7):140. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070140.
2
Emotion regulation as a mediator on the relationship between emotional awareness and depression in elementary school students.情绪调节作为小学生情绪意识与抑郁之间关系的中介因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 15;14:1127246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127246. eCollection 2023.
3
Levels of Emotional Awareness: Theory and Measurement of a Socio-Emotional Skill.
情绪意识水平:一种社会情感技能的理论与测量
J Intell. 2021 Aug 19;9(3):42. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence9030042.
4
Pathways Into Psychosocial Adjustment in Children: Modeling the Effects of Trait Emotional Intelligence, Social-Emotional Problems, and Gender.儿童心理社会适应的途径:模拟特质情商、社会情感问题和性别的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 12;10:507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00507. eCollection 2019.