a Department of Psychology , University of Nevada , Las Vegas.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Jan-Feb;100(1):107-115. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1282866. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS; Lane, Quinlan, Schwartz, Walker, & Zeitlin, 1990 ) is an open-ended measure of the ability to describe emotional reactions. Scoring the LEAS by hand is complex and time consuming (Barchard, Bajgar, Leaf, & Lane, 2010 ). Therefore, Program for Open-Ended Scoring (POES; Leaf & Barchard, 2010 ) was designed to score the LEAS quickly and easily. Using 268 undergraduates, this article compares traditional LEAS hand scoring to 6 POES methods, 2 of which are holistic methods that have never before been examined. Based on split-half reliability, correlations with measures of emotional and social intelligence, and partial correlations once response length and vocabulary were partialed out, we recommend 3 of the POES methods when testing nonclinical samples of young adults. Because POES scoring is fast and efficient, it allows more researchers and clinicians to use the LEAS, thus moving away from self-report measures of emotional awareness.
情绪意识水平量表（LEAS；Lane、Quinlan、Schwartz、Walker 和 Zeitlin，1990）是一种衡量描述情绪反应能力的开放性测量工具。手动评分 LEAS 既复杂又耗时（Barchard、Bajgar、Leaf 和 Lane，2010）。因此，开放式评分程序（POES；Leaf 和 Barchard，2010）旨在快速轻松地对 LEAS 进行评分。本文使用 268 名本科生，将传统的 LEAS 手动评分与 6 种 POES 方法进行了比较，其中 2 种是以前从未检验过的整体方法。基于半分可靠性、与情绪和社会智力衡量标准的相关性，以及一旦剔除反应长度和词汇的偏相关，我们建议在测试年轻成年人的非临床样本时使用 3 种 POES 方法。由于 POES 评分快速高效，它允许更多的研究人员和临床医生使用 LEAS，从而远离自我报告的情绪意识衡量标准。
