Suppr超能文献

急诊科疑似感染患者的严重程度评分:一项前瞻性验证研究。

Severity Scores in Emergency Department Patients With Presumed Infection: A Prospective Validation Study.

作者信息

Williams Julian M, Greenslade Jaimi H, Chu Kevin, Brown Anthony F T, Lipman Jeffrey

机构信息

1Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.2School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.3School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):539-47. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001427.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to 1) validate a number of severity of illness scores in a large cohort of emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection and 2) compare the performance of scores in patient subgroups with increasing mortality: infection without systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Adult emergency department in a metropolitan tertiary, university-affiliated hospital.

PATIENTS

Emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

METHODS

Consecutive emergency department patients admitted with presumed infection were identified over 160 weeks in two periods between 2007 and 2011. Clinical and laboratory data sufficient to calculate Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and the Severe Sepsis Score were entered into a database. Model discrimination was quantified using area under the receiver operating curve. Calibration was assessed using visual plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, and linear regressions of observed and predicted values.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 8,871 patients were enrolled with 30-day mortality of 3.7%. Area under the receiver operating curve values for the entire cohort were: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score of 0.92, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 0.90, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 0.86, and Severe Sepsis Score of 0.82. Discrimination decreased in subgroups with greater mortality for each score. All scores overestimated mortality, but closest concordance between predicted and observed mortality was seen with Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in area under the receiver operating curve seen in subgroups with increasing mortality may explain some variation in results seen in previous validation studies. Scores developed in intensive care settings overestimated mortality in the emergency department. Our results underscore the importance of employing predictive models developed in similar patient populations. The Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score outperformed more complex predictive models and would be the most appropriate scoring system for use in similar emergency department populations with a wide spectrum of mortality risk.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:1)在一大批因疑似感染而入院的急诊科患者中验证多种疾病严重程度评分;2)比较不同死亡率患者亚组中各评分的表现,这些亚组包括无全身炎症反应综合征的感染、脓毒症、严重脓毒症和感染性休克。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

一所大都市三级大学附属医院的成人急诊科。

患者

因疑似感染而入院的急诊科患者。

干预措施

无。

方法

在2007年至2011年期间的两个阶段,连续160周确定因疑似感染而入院的急诊科患者。将足以计算急诊科脓毒症死亡率评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II、简化急性生理评分II、序贯器官衰竭评估和严重脓毒症评分的临床和实验室数据录入数据库。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积对模型辨别力进行量化。使用直观图、Hosmer-Lemeshow统计量以及观察值与预测值的线性回归来评估校准情况。

测量指标及主要结果

共纳入8871例患者,30天死亡率为3.7%。整个队列的受试者工作特征曲线下面积值分别为:急诊科脓毒症死亡率评分为0.92,简化急性生理评分II和急性生理与慢性健康状况评价II评分为0.90,序贯器官衰竭评估评分为0.86,严重脓毒症评分为0.82。各评分在死亡率较高的亚组中辨别力下降。所有评分均高估了死亡率,但急诊科脓毒症死亡率评分在预测死亡率与观察死亡率之间的一致性最为接近。

结论

死亡率增加的亚组中受试者工作特征曲线下面积的下降可能解释了以往验证研究中结果的一些差异。在重症监护环境中开发的评分高估了急诊科的死亡率。我们的结果强调了采用在相似患者群体中开发的预测模型的重要性。急诊科脓毒症死亡率评分优于更复杂的预测模型,将是在具有广泛死亡风险的类似急诊科人群中使用的最合适评分系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验