• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)治疗直肠病变:一项系统评价

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Lesions: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Hong Kwang Dae, Kang Sanghee, Urn Jun Won, Lee Sun Il

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Jun;62(140):863-7.

PMID:26902017
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has received attention as an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal lesions. We review the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS for the treatment of rectal lesions.

METHODOLOGY

The MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using predefined inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were positive margin rate, recurrence rate, conversion rate, range of applications, and complication rates. To derive pooled estimates of proportions with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for the outcomes, a random effect model was used.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 155 patients were identified. The weighted mean size of rectal lesions was 3.3 cm (range 0.2-10 cm) and the weighted mean distance from the anal verge was 7.4 cm (range 0-20 cm). Six studies enrolled only the patients with low and mid rectal lesions mainly to avoid peritoneal entrance during excision.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evidence from this limited number of studies, TAMIS appears to be an effective and safe treatment for rec tal lesions. However, the clinical outcome of TAMIS according to the location of the rectal lesions needs to be clarified. Comparison with other established surgical treatments are also mandatory.

摘要

背景/目的:经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)作为直肠病变经肛门内镜显微手术的替代方法已受到关注。我们回顾了TAMIS治疗直肠病变的有效性和安全性。

方法

使用预定义的纳入标准检索MEDLINE、科学网和考克兰图书馆数据库。主要结局指标为切缘阳性率、复发率、中转率、应用范围和并发症发生率。为得出结局指标的95%置信区间(CI)的合并比例估计值,采用随机效应模型。

结果

共纳入12项研究,涉及155例患者。直肠病变的加权平均大小为3.3 cm(范围0.2 - 10 cm),距肛缘的加权平均距离为7.4 cm(范围0 - 20 cm)。6项研究仅纳入了直肠中低位病变患者,主要是为了避免切除过程中进入腹腔。

结论

基于这有限数量研究的证据,TAMIS似乎是治疗直肠病变的一种有效且安全的方法。然而,TAMIS根据直肠病变位置的临床结局仍需阐明。与其他既定手术治疗方法的比较也必不可少。

相似文献

1
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS) for Rectal Lesions: A Systematic Review.经肛门微创手术(TAMIS)治疗直肠病变:一项系统评价
Hepatogastroenterology. 2015 Jun;62(140):863-7.
2
Trans‑anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus rigid platforms for local excision of early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.经肛门微创外科手术(TAMIS)与刚性平台用于早期直肠癌局部切除:文献的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4198-4206. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11065-6. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经肛门内镜显微手术与标准经肛门切除术治疗直肠肿瘤的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Feb;58(2):254-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000309.
4
Robot-assisted TAMIS: a systematic review of feasibility and outcomes.机器人辅助 TAMIS:可行性和结果的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3398-3409. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09853-z. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
5
A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的系统评价:这会是直肠癌手术的未来吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/codi.13151.
6
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review.经肛门内镜显微手术:一项系统评价。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):270-84. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0804-8.
7
Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of usual-type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia.治疗寻常型外阴上皮内瘤变的医学和外科干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD011837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011837.pub2.
8
Does Minimally Invasive Surgery Provide Better Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Than Open Surgery in the Treatment of Hallux Valgus Deformity? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.微创外科治疗拇外翻畸形是否优于开放手术:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jun 1;481(6):1143-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002471. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
9
Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床结局及病例数量效应:一项系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):811-824. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
10
Comparison of the transanal surgical techniques for local excision of rectal tumors: a network meta-analysis.经肛门直肠肿瘤局部切除的不同手术技术比较:网状 Meta 分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jul;35(7):1173-1182. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03634-7. Epub 2020 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for rectal neoplasms: results from a single centre.经肛门微创外科(TAMIS)治疗直肠肿瘤的实施:单中心研究结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Mar;26(3):175-180. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02556-y. Epub 2021 Dec 14.