• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床结局及病例数量效应:一项系统评价

Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review.

作者信息

Deijen C L, Tsai A, Koedam T W A, Veltcamp Helbach M, Sietses C, Lacy A M, Bonjer H J, Tuynman J B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):811-824. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0
PMID:27853973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5156667/
Abstract

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been developed to improve quality of TME for patients with mid and low rectal cancer. However, despite enthusiastic uptake and teaching facilities, concern exists for safe introduction. TaTME is a complex procedure and potentially a learning curve will hamper clinical outcome. With this systematic review, we aim to provide data regarding morbidity and safety of TaTME. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid) and Cochrane Library. Case reports, cohort series and comparative series on TaTME for rectal cancer were included. To evaluate a potential effect of case volume, low-volume centres (n ≤ 30 total volume) were compared with high-volume centres (n > 30 total volume). Thirty-three studies were identified (three case reports, 25 case series, five comparative studies), including 794 patients. Conversion was performed in 3.0% of the procedures. The complication rate was 40.3, and 11.5% were major complications. The quality of the mesorectum was "complete" in 87.6%, and the circumferential resection margin (CRM) was involved in 4.7%. In low- versus high-volume centres, the conversion rate was 4.3 versus 2.7%, and major complication rates were 12.2 versus 10.5%, respectively. TME quality was "complete" in 80.5 versus 89.7%, and CRM involvement was 4.8 and 4.5% in low- versus high-volume centres, respectively. TaTME for mid and low rectal cancer is a promising technique; however, it is associated with considerable morbidity. Safe implementation of the TaTME should include proctoring and quality assurance preferably within a trial setting.

摘要

经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)已被开发用于提高中低位直肠癌患者的全直肠系膜切除术(TME)质量。然而,尽管该手术受到广泛欢迎且有教学设施,但对于其安全引入仍存在担忧。TaTME是一种复杂的手术,潜在的学习曲线可能会影响临床结果。通过本系统评价,我们旨在提供有关TaTME发病率和安全性的数据。在MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE(Ovid)和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索。纳入了关于TaTME治疗直肠癌的病例报告、队列研究和比较研究。为了评估病例数量的潜在影响,将低手术量中心(总手术量≤30例)与高手术量中心(总手术量>30例)进行了比较。共识别出33项研究(3例病例报告、25例病例系列、5项比较研究),包括794例患者。3.0%的手术进行了中转。并发症发生率为40.3%,其中11.5%为严重并发症。直肠系膜质量“完整”的比例为87.6%,环周切缘(CRM)受累的比例为4.7%。在低手术量中心与高手术量中心,中转率分别为4.3%和2.7%,严重并发症发生率分别为12.2%和10.5%。TME质量“完整”的比例在低手术量中心与高手术量中心分别为80.5%和89.7%,CRM受累率分别为4.8%和4.5%。TaTME治疗中低位直肠癌是一项有前景的技术;然而,它与相当高的发病率相关。TaTME的安全实施应包括在试验环境中进行监督和质量保证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/9d817d87af63/10151_2016_1545_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/a4c1d8f2faf7/10151_2016_1545_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/cfbf7e43908e/10151_2016_1545_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/9d817d87af63/10151_2016_1545_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/a4c1d8f2faf7/10151_2016_1545_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/cfbf7e43908e/10151_2016_1545_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/5156667/9d817d87af63/10151_2016_1545_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的临床结局及病例数量效应:一项系统评价
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Dec;20(12):811-824. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1545-0. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术相比的肿瘤学及围手术期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 4;16:380. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2428-5.
3
The application of transanal total mesorectal excision for patients with middle and low rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术在中低位直肠癌患者中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11410. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011410.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted transabdominal total mesorectal excision and transanal total mesorectal excision: which approach offers optimal short-term outcomes for mid-to-low rectal adenocarcinoma?机器人辅助经腹全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析:哪种方法为中低位直肠腺癌提供最佳的短期疗效?
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Nov;25(11):1183-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02515-7. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
5
A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery?经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的系统评价:这会是直肠癌手术的未来吗?
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/codi.13151.
6
Impact of trans-anal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on the surgical and pathologic outcomes of patients with rectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对直肠癌患者手术和病理结局的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 20;408(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03147-1.
7
Defining the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定义经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Mar;92(3):355-364. doi: 10.1111/ans.17262. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Comparing the perioperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes between robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies with a subgroup analysis for overweight patients.比较机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的围手术期、术后及肿瘤学结局:一项前瞻性研究的更新系统评价和荟萃分析,并对超重患者进行亚组分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 8;19(1):276. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02460-9.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis on complications of transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 Oct;23(10):2527-2538. doi: 10.1111/codi.15792. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
10
The learning curve of laparoscopic, robot-assisted and transanal total mesorectal excisions: a systematic review.腹腔镜、机器人辅助和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6337-6360. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09087-z. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the postoperative outcomes between the robotic transabdominal approach alone and the combined robotic transabdominal and conventional transanal approach for rectal cancer.单纯机器人经腹入路与机器人经腹联合传统经肛门入路治疗直肠癌的术后结果比较。
Surg Today. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-03120-z.
2
Short- and long-term impact of the TaTME learning process: a single institutional study.经肛全直肠系膜切除术学习过程的短期和长期影响:一项单机构研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03065-4.
3
Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
A two-centre experience of transanal total mesorectal excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的双中心经验
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;18(12):1154-1161. doi: 10.1111/codi.13394.
2
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Single-Incision Laparoscopy for Rectal Cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术联合单孔腹腔镜治疗直肠癌
JSLS. 2016 Apr-Jun;20(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00007.
3
First international training and assessment consensus workshop on transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME).经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)首次国际培训与评估共识研讨会
直肠癌全直肠系膜切除及相关手术的基本知识和技术要点
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):384-411. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00388.0055. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Transanal total mesorectal excision: short- and long-term results of four certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:德国四家结直肠癌认证中心的短期和长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Aug 15;39(1):132. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04704-w.
5
Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation.保肛时代的低位直肠癌治疗选择。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024 Apr;25(4):434-452. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in rectal cancer treatment within an expert center.在专家中心进行的经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)用于直肠癌治疗。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 10;13(1):17084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44247-8.
7
What Is the Comparative Efficacy of Surgical, Endoscopic, Transanal Resection, and Radiotherapy Modalities in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer?手术、内镜、经肛门切除术及放疗方式治疗直肠癌的疗效对比如何?
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 20;11(16):2347. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162347.
8
Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision.机器人手术联合经肛全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的可行性和安全性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Mar 29;408(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z.
9
Automatic purse-string suture skill assessment in transanal total mesorectal excision using deep learning-based video analysis.基于深度学习的视频分析在经肛门全直肠系膜切除术中自动荷包缝合技能评估。
BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac176.
10
Meta-analysis of transanal laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal cancer: Importance of appropriate patient selection.低位直肠癌经肛门腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的Meta分析:合适患者选择的重要性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):1397-1410. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1397.
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Jun;20(6):343-352. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1454-2. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
4
True NOTES TME resection with splenic flexure release, high ligation of IMA, and side-to-end hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis.真正的经自然腔道内镜手术全直肠系膜切除术,包括脾曲游离、肠系膜下动脉高位结扎以及端侧手工缝合结肠肛管吻合术。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4626-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4731-7. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门和腹腔镜直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后的短期结局
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Apr;20(4):227-34. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1421-3. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
6
Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: early outcomes in 50 consecutive patients.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:50例连续患者的早期结果
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;18(6):570-7. doi: 10.1111/codi.13263.
7
Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(taTME)治疗直肠癌:一条培训路径。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4680-1. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Transanal rectal resection: an initial experience of 20 cases.经肛门直肠切除术:20例初步经验
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):45-50. doi: 10.1111/codi.13227.
9
The anthropometric definition of the rectum is highly variable.直肠的人体测量学定义差异很大。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):189-95. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2458-5. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: initial experience from Denmark.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:丹麦的初步经验
Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):51-8. doi: 10.1111/codi.13225.