Suppr超能文献

不明原因不孕症的循证治疗方法:一项系统综述。

Evidence-based approach to unexplained infertility: a systematic review.

作者信息

Gunn Deidre D, Bates G Wright

机构信息

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1566-1574.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the available evidence for the efficacy of various treatments for unexplained infertility.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S): Patients aged 18-40 years with unexplained infertility.

INTERVENTION(S): Clomiphene citrate, letrozole, timed intercourse, IUI, gonadotropins, IVF, and IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate.

RESULT(S): Thirteen studies with a total of 3,081 patients were identified by systematic search and met inclusion criteria. The available literature demonstrates that expectant management may be comparable to treatment with clomiphene and timed intercourse or IUI. Clomiphene may be more effective than letrozole, and treatment with gonadotropins seems more effective, albeit with significantly higher risk of multiple gestations than either oral agent. On the basis of current data, IVF, with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection, is no more effective than gonadotropins with IUI for unexplained infertility.

CONCLUSION(S): Adequately powered, randomized controlled trials that compare all of the available treatments for unexplained infertility are needed. Until such data are available, clinicians should individualize the management of unexplained infertility with appropriate counseling regarding the empiric nature of current treatment options including IVF.

摘要

目的

总结各种治疗不明原因不孕症的疗效的现有证据。

设计

系统评价。

地点

不适用。

患者

年龄在18至40岁之间的不明原因不孕症患者。

干预措施

枸橼酸氯米芬、来曲唑、定时性交、宫腔内人工授精(IUI)、促性腺激素、体外受精(IVF)以及卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF-ICSI)。

主要观察指标

临床妊娠率、持续妊娠率和活产率。

结果

通过系统检索确定了13项研究,共3081例患者,均符合纳入标准。现有文献表明,期待治疗可能与使用氯米芬、定时性交或宫腔内人工授精治疗效果相当。氯米芬可能比来曲唑更有效,促性腺激素治疗似乎更有效,尽管多胎妊娠风险明显高于任何一种口服药物。根据目前的数据,对于不明原因不孕症,有无卵胞浆内单精子注射的体外受精并不比促性腺激素联合宫腔内人工授精更有效。

结论

需要开展足够样本量的随机对照试验,以比较所有治疗不明原因不孕症的现有疗法。在获得此类数据之前,临床医生应对不明原因不孕症患者进行个体化管理,并就包括体外受精在内的当前治疗方案的经验性本质提供适当的咨询。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验