Kurti Allison N, Klemperer Elias M, Zvorsky Ivori, Redner Ryan, Priest Jeff S, Higgins Stephen T
Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, United States; Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect Street, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.026. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
Individuals with a General Educational Development (GED) degree have the highest smoking prevalence of any education level, including high school dropouts without a GED. Yet little research has been reported providing a context for understanding the exception that the GED represents in the otherwise graded inverse relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence. We investigated whether the GED may be associated with a general riskier profile that includes but is not limited to increased smoking prevalence.
Data were obtained from three years (2011-2013) of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health ([NSDUH], N=55,940]). Prevalence of risky repertoire indicators (e.g., ever arrested, seldom/never wears a seatbelt), indicators of social instability (e.g., frequent relocations), and risky demographic characteristics (e.g., male gender) were compared among high school dropouts, GED holders, and high school graduates using Rao-Scott chi square goodness-of-fit tests and multiple logistic regression.
Those with GEDs differed significantly between both high school dropouts and high school graduates across 19 of 27 (70.4%) risk indicators. Controlling for risky profile characteristics accounted for a significant but limited (25-30%) proportion of the variance in smoking prevalence across these three education levels.
GED holders exhibit a broad high-risk profile of which smoking is just one component. Future research evaluating additional risk indicators and mechanisms that may underpin this generalized risky repertoire are likely needed for a more complete understanding of GED's place in the important relationship between educational attainment and smoking prevalence.
拥有普通教育发展证书(GED)的人群在所有教育水平中吸烟率最高,包括没有GED的高中辍学者。然而,鲜有研究报告能为理解GED所代表的例外情况提供背景,即在教育程度与吸烟率之间原本分级的负相关关系中,GED是个例外。我们调查了GED是否可能与包括但不限于吸烟率增加在内的一般更高风险特征相关。
数据取自三年(2011 - 2013年)的全国药物使用和健康调查([NSDUH],N = 55,940)。使用Rao - Scott卡方拟合优度检验和多重逻辑回归,比较了高中辍学者、GED持有者和高中毕业生中风险行为指标(如曾被捕、很少/从不系安全带)、社会不稳定指标(如频繁搬家)以及高风险人口特征(如男性)的发生率。
在27个风险指标中的19个(70.4%)方面,GED持有者与高中辍学者和高中毕业生均存在显著差异。控制风险特征在这三个教育水平的吸烟率差异中占显著但有限(25 - 30%)的比例。
GED持有者呈现出广泛的高风险特征,吸烟只是其中一个组成部分。未来可能需要进行更多研究,评估可能支撑这种普遍高风险行为的其他风险指标和机制,以便更全面地理解GED在教育程度与吸烟率这一重要关系中的地位。