Suppr超能文献

与微创腰椎手术尤其是极外侧椎间融合术相关的神经根损伤更为常见:一项综述。

More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.

作者信息

Epstein Nancy E

机构信息

Department of Neurousrgery, Winthrop Neuroscience, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Jan 25;7(Suppl 3):S83-95. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.174895. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the lumbar spine, do more nerve root injuries occur utilizing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques versus open lumbar procedures? To answer this question, we compared the frequency of nerve root injuries for multiple open versus MIS operations including diskectomy, laminectomy with/without fusion addressing degenerative disc disease, stenosis, and/or degenerative spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

Several of Desai et al. large Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial studies showed the frequency for nerve root injury following an open diskectomy ranged from 0.13% to 0.25%, for open laminectomy/stenosis with/without fusion it was 0%, and for open laminectomy/stenosis/degenerative spondylolisthesis with/without fusion it was 2%.

RESULTS

Alternatively, one study compared the incidence of root injuries utilizing MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) techniques; 7.8% of PLIF versus 2% of TLIF patients sustained root injuries. Furthermore, even higher frequencies of radiculitis and nerve root injuries occurred during anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIFs) versus extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIFs). These high frequencies were far from acceptable; 15.8% following ALIF experienced postoperative radiculitis, while 23.8% undergoing XLIF sustained root/plexus deficits.

CONCLUSIONS

This review indicates that MIS (TLIF/PLIF/ALIF/XLIF) lumbar surgery resulted in a higher incidence of root injuries, radiculitis, or plexopathy versus open lumbar surgical techniques. Furthermore, even a cursory look at the XLIF data demonstrated the greater danger posed to neural tissue by this newest addition to the MIS lumbar surgical armamentariu. The latter should prompt us as spine surgeons to question why the XLIF procedure is still being offered to our patients?

摘要

背景

在腰椎手术中,与开放性腰椎手术相比,采用微创手术(MIS)技术时神经根损伤的发生率是否更高?为回答这个问题,我们比较了多种开放性手术与MIS手术(包括椎间盘切除术、治疗退行性椎间盘疾病、椎管狭窄和/或退行性椎体滑脱的椎板切除术加或不加融合术)中神经根损伤的频率。

方法

德赛等人的几项大型脊柱患者预后研究试验表明,开放性椎间盘切除术后神经根损伤的频率为0.13%至0.25%,开放性椎板切除术/椎管狭窄术加或不加融合术的神经根损伤频率为0%,开放性椎板切除术/椎管狭窄术/退行性椎体滑脱术加或不加融合术的神经根损伤频率为2%。

结果

另外,一项研究比较了采用MIS经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)与后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)技术时神经根损伤的发生率;PLIF患者中有7.8%发生神经根损伤,而TLIF患者中这一比例为2%。此外,与极外侧椎体间融合术(XLIF)相比,前路腰椎椎体间融合术(ALIF)期间神经根炎和神经根损伤的频率甚至更高。这些高频率远不能接受;ALIF术后有15.8%的患者发生神经根炎,而接受XLIF手术的患者中有23.8%出现神经根/神经丛功能缺损。

结论

本综述表明,与开放性腰椎手术技术相比,MIS(TLIF/PLIF/ALIF/XLIF)腰椎手术导致神经根损伤、神经根炎或神经丛病变的发生率更高。此外,即使粗略查看XLIF数据也表明,MIS腰椎手术器械库中的这一最新术式对神经组织构成了更大的危险。后者应促使我们脊柱外科医生质疑为何仍向我们的患者提供XLIF手术?

相似文献

3
Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?极外侧腰椎椎间融合术:弊端是否大于益处?
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191079. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

10
Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?极外侧腰椎椎间融合术:弊端是否大于益处?
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191079. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

5
Comparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎椎间融合不同手术入路的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Feb;22(2):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验