• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尽管疾病严重程度总体相似,但意大利双相II型患者比双相I型患者有更好的个人功能。

Italian Bipolar II vs I patients have better individual functioning, in spite of overall similar illness severity.

作者信息

Dell'Osso Bernardo, Dobrea Cristina, Cremaschi Laura, Buoli Massimiliano, Miller Shefali, Ketter Terence A, Altamura A Carlo

机构信息

1Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti,Università degli Studi di Milano,Dipartimento di Salute Mentale,Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda,Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano,Italy.

2Bipolar Disorders Clinic,Stanford Medical School,Stanford University,Stanford,Calfornia,USA.

出版信息

CNS Spectr. 2017 Aug;22(4):325-332. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000887. Epub 2016 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1017/S1092852915000887
PMID:26905615
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Introduction Bipolar disorders (BDs) comprise different variants of chronic, comorbid, and disabling conditions, with relevant suicide and suicide attempt rates. The hypothesis that BD types I (BDI) and II (BDII) represent more and less severe forms of illness, respectively, has been increasingly questioned over recent years, justifying additional investigation to better characterize related sociodemographic and clinical profiles.

METHODS

A sample of 217 outpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)-described BD (141 BDI, 76 BDII), without a current syndromal mood episode, was recruited, and sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of BDI and II patients were compared.

RESULTS

BDII patients had significantly more favorable sociodemographics, in relation to occupational stability, cohabitation, and marital status. However, BDII compared with BDI patients had significantly longer duration of untreated illness, more frequent lifetime anxiety disorders comorbidity, longer most recent episode duration, higher rate of depressive first/most recent episode, and more current antidepressant use. In contrast, BDI compared with BDII patients had significantly more severe illness in terms of earlier age at onset; higher rate of elevated first/most recent episode, lifetime hospitalizations, and involuntary commitments; lower Global Assessment of Functioning score; and more current antipsychotic use. BDI and II patients had similar duration of illness, psychiatric family history, lifetime number of suicide attempts, current subthreshold symptoms, history of stressful life events, and overall psychiatric/medical comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

BDII compared with BDI patients had more favorable sociodemographic features, but a mixture of specific unfavorable illness characteristics, confirming that BDII is not just a milder form of BD and requires further investigation in the field.

摘要

未标注

引言 双相情感障碍(BDs)包括慢性、共病且致残状况的不同变体,伴有相关的自杀和自杀未遂率。近年来,I型双相情感障碍(BDI)和II型双相情感障碍(BDII)分别代表病情较轻和较重形式的这一假设受到越来越多的质疑,这使得有必要进行更多研究以更好地描述相关的社会人口学和临床特征。

方法

招募了217名符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)描述的双相情感障碍门诊患者(141例BDI,76例BDII),目前无综合征性情绪发作,并比较了BDI和BDII患者的社会人口学和临床特征。

结果

BDII患者在职业稳定性、同居和婚姻状况方面的社会人口学特征明显更有利。然而,与BDI患者相比,BDII患者的未治疗疾病持续时间明显更长,终生焦虑症共病更频繁,最近一次发作持续时间更长,抑郁首发/最近一次发作率更高,目前使用抗抑郁药的比例更高。相比之下,与BDII患者相比,BDI患者在发病年龄更早方面病情明显更严重;首发/最近一次发作升高、终生住院和非自愿住院的比例更高;功能总体评估得分更低;目前使用抗精神病药的比例更高。BDI和BDII患者在疾病持续时间、精神科家族史、终生自杀未遂次数、目前阈下症状、应激性生活事件史以及总体精神科/内科共病方面相似。

结论

与BDI患者相比BDII患者具有更有利的社会人口学特征,但也有一些特定的不利疾病特征,这证实了BDII并非只是BD的较轻形式,需要在该领域进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Italian Bipolar II vs I patients have better individual functioning, in spite of overall similar illness severity.尽管疾病严重程度总体相似,但意大利双相II型患者比双相I型患者有更好的个人功能。
CNS Spectr. 2017 Aug;22(4):325-332. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000887. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
2
American tertiary clinic-referred bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder: More severe in multiple ways, but less severe in a few other ways.美国三级诊所转诊的双相情感障碍 II 型与双相情感障碍 I 型相比:在多个方面更严重,但在其他一些方面则较轻。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Dec 1;188:257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
3
Different characteristics associated with suicide attempts among bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder patients.双相I型障碍与双相II型障碍患者自杀未遂相关的不同特征。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 May;76:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
4
Differential prevalence and demographic and clinical correlates of second-generation antipsychotic use in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder.双相I型障碍与双相II型障碍中第二代抗精神病药物使用的差异患病率以及人口统计学和临床相关因素
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 May;76:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
Characteristics of bipolar I and II disorder: A study of 8766 individuals.双相情感障碍 I 型和 II 型的特征:一项对 8766 人的研究。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jun;22(4):392-400. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12867. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
6
Antipsychotic use in Northern Italian inter-episode bipolar disorder patients: considering both second- and first-generation agents.意大利北部发作间期双相情感障碍患者的抗精神病药物使用:同时考虑第二代和第一代药物。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan;35(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000283.
7
Impact of anxiety disorder comorbidity on quality of life in euthymic bipolar disorder patients: differences between bipolar I and II subtypes.焦虑症共病对双相情感障碍缓解期患者生活质量的影响:I型与II型双相情感障碍亚型之间的差异
J Affect Disord. 2008 Jan;105(1-3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.020. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
8
Anxiety disorders anticipate the diagnosis of bipolar disorder in comorbid patients: Findings from an Italian tertiary clinic.焦虑障碍可预测共病患者双相障碍的诊断:来自意大利一家三级诊所的研究结果。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Oct 1;257:376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.033. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
Differential core pharmacotherapy in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder and European versus American patients not in a syndromal episode.双相 I 型与双相 II 型障碍以及非综合征发作的欧洲与美国患者的核心药理学差异治疗。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan;35(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000282.
10
Lifetime presence of psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder is associated with less favorable socio-demographic and certain clinical features.双相情感障碍中精神病性症状的终生存在与不太有利的社会人口统计学和某些临床特征相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;76:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Bipolar II disorder: a state-of-the-art review.双相II型障碍:最新综述
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):175-189. doi: 10.1002/wps.21300.
2
Characterization of Bipolar Disorder I and II: Clinical Features, Comorbidities, and Pharmacological Pattern.双相 I 型和 II 型障碍的特征:临床特征、共病及药理学模式
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 1;25(4):472-479. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241474. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Network dysfunction of sadness facial expression processing and morphometry in euthymic bipolar disorder.
心境正常的双相情感障碍患者悲伤面部表情处理和形态测量的网络功能障碍。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Apr;274(3):525-536. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01649-z. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Differential characteristics of bipolar I and II disorders: a retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of clinical features, illness course, and response to treatment.双相 I 型和 II 型障碍的差异特征:对临床特征、病程及治疗反应的回顾性横断面评估
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023 Jul 14;11(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9.
5
The impact of bipolar spectrum disorders on professional functioning: A systematic review.双相谱系障碍对职业功能的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 24;13:951008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.951008. eCollection 2022.
6
Differences between bipolar disorder types 1 and 2 support the DSM two-syndrome concept.双相情感障碍1型和2型之间的差异支持了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》的双综合征概念。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2022 Aug 3;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40345-022-00268-2.
7
Therapeutic Interventions to Mitigate Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress-Induced Damage in Patients with Bipolar Disorder.治疗干预以减轻双相情感障碍患者线粒体功能障碍和氧化应激诱导的损伤。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 6;23(3):1844. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031844.
8
The functional impairment of different subtypes and occupational states in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.双相障碍缓解期不同亚型和职业状态患者的功能损害。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 7;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03242-x.
9
Predictors of psychosocial outcome of bipolar disorder: data from the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network.双相情感障碍心理社会结局的预测因素:来自斯坦利基金会双相情感障碍网络的数据。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2019 Dec 16;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0169-5.
10
Cognitive Performance in Euthymic Patients with Bipolar Disorder vs Healthy Controls: A Neuropsychological Investigation.双相情感障碍心境正常患者与健康对照者的认知表现:一项神经心理学调查。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017 Jul 27;13:71-81. doi: 10.2174/1745017901713010071. eCollection 2017.