• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相 I 型与双相 II 型障碍以及非综合征发作的欧洲与美国患者的核心药理学差异治疗。

Differential core pharmacotherapy in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder and European versus American patients not in a syndromal episode.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences 'Luigi Sacco'.

Department of Mental Health, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan;35(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000282.

DOI:10.1097/YIC.0000000000000282
PMID:31609786
Abstract

Assess bipolar disorder subtype and treatment location effects on bipolar disorder core pharmacotherapy. Outpatients not in a syndromal episode referred to the University of Milan and Stanford University Bipolar Disorder Clinics were assessed with SCID for the fourth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mood Disorders, and the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder Affective Disorders Evaluation, respectively. Prevalence and clinical correlates of antidepressant, antipsychotic, and mood stabilizer use, in aggregate and individually, were compared in bipolar I (BDI) versus II (BDII) patients in Milan/Stanford and in Milan versus Stanford patients, stratified by subtype. Milan/Stanford pooled BDI versus BDII patients significantly more often took antipsychotic (69.8 versus 44.8%), mood stabilizers (68.6 versus 57.7%), and valproate (40.1 versus 17.5%), and less often took antidepressants (23.1 versus 55.6%) and lamotrigine (9.9 versus 25.2%). Milan versus Stanford patients (stratified by bipolar disorder subtype) significantly more often took antipsychotic (BDI and BDII), antidepressants (BDII), and valproate (BDII), and less often took lamotrigine (BDI). Research regarding bipolar disorder core pharmacotherapy relationships with bipolar subtype and treatment location is warranted to enhance clinical management.

摘要

评估双相情感障碍亚型和治疗地点对双相情感障碍核心药物治疗的影响。未处于综合征发作期的门诊患者被转介到米兰大学和斯坦福大学双相情感障碍诊所,分别使用《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版和系统性治疗增强计划对双相情感障碍情感障碍评估进行 SCID 评估。在米兰/斯坦福和米兰与斯坦福的患者中,按亚型分层,比较了双相 I 型(BDI)与 II 型(BDII)患者中抗抑郁药、抗精神病药和心境稳定剂的使用情况,包括总体情况和个体情况。米兰/斯坦福汇总的 BDI 与 BDII 患者更常使用抗精神病药(69.8%与 44.8%)、心境稳定剂(68.6%与 57.7%)和丙戊酸盐(40.1%与 17.5%),而较少使用抗抑郁药(23.1%与 55.6%)和拉莫三嗪(9.9%与 25.2%)。按双相情感障碍亚型分层的米兰与斯坦福患者更常使用抗精神病药(BDI 和 BDII)、抗抑郁药(BDII)和丙戊酸盐(BDII),而较少使用拉莫三嗪(BDI)。需要进行关于双相情感障碍核心药物治疗与双相情感障碍亚型和治疗地点关系的研究,以增强临床管理。

相似文献

1
Differential core pharmacotherapy in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder and European versus American patients not in a syndromal episode.双相 I 型与双相 II 型障碍以及非综合征发作的欧洲与美国患者的核心药理学差异治疗。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020 Jan;35(1):8-18. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000282.
2
[Prescribed drug use for bipolar disorder type I and II in clinical practice].[临床实践中用于I型和II型双相情感障碍的处方药使用情况]
Lakartidningen. 2017 Jan 10;114:D77T.
3
Differential prevalence and demographic and clinical correlates of second-generation antipsychotic use in bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder.双相I型障碍与双相II型障碍中第二代抗精神病药物使用的差异患病率以及人口统计学和临床相关因素
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 May;76:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Italian Bipolar II vs I patients have better individual functioning, in spite of overall similar illness severity.尽管疾病严重程度总体相似,但意大利双相II型患者比双相I型患者有更好的个人功能。
CNS Spectr. 2017 Aug;22(4):325-332. doi: 10.1017/S1092852915000887. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
5
Treatment and outcomes of an Australian cohort of outpatients with bipolar I or schizoaffective disorder over twenty-four months: implications for clinical practice.澳大利亚双相情感障碍 I 或精神分裂症谱系障碍门诊患者 24 个月的治疗和结局:对临床实践的启示。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Dec 17;12:228. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-228.
6
International prescribing patterns for mood illness: the International Mood Network (IMN).情绪疾病的国际处方模式:国际情绪网络(IMN)。
J Affect Disord. 2014;167:136-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.049. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Characteristics of bipolar I and II disorder: A study of 8766 individuals.双相情感障碍 I 型和 II 型的特征:一项对 8766 人的研究。
Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jun;22(4):392-400. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12867. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
8
American tertiary clinic-referred bipolar II disorder compared to bipolar I disorder: More severe in multiple ways, but less severe in a few other ways.美国三级诊所转诊的双相情感障碍 II 型与双相情感障碍 I 型相比:在多个方面更严重,但在其他一些方面则较轻。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Dec 1;188:257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
Receipt of guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy among children with new diagnoses of bipolar disorder.新诊断为双相情感障碍的儿童接受指南一致的药物治疗情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Dec;62(12):1443-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.000452011.
10
Different characteristics associated with suicide attempts among bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder patients.双相I型障碍与双相II型障碍患者自杀未遂相关的不同特征。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 May;76:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
A naturalistic effectiveness study of maintenance therapies for the bipolar disorders.双相障碍维持治疗的自然疗效研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Feb;149(2):98-109. doi: 10.1111/acps.13646. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
2
Differential characteristics of bipolar I and II disorders: a retrospective, cross-sectional evaluation of clinical features, illness course, and response to treatment.双相 I 型和 II 型障碍的差异特征:对临床特征、病程及治疗反应的回顾性横断面评估
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2023 Jul 14;11(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40345-023-00304-9.
3
Bipolar I and bipolar II subtypes in older age: Results from the Global Aging and Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder (GAGE-BD) project.
老年双相情感障碍 I 型和双相情感障碍 II 型亚型:来自全球老年和老年双相情感障碍实验(GAGE-BD)项目的结果。
Bipolar Disord. 2023 Feb;25(1):43-55. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13271. Epub 2022 Nov 23.