Suppr超能文献

用于格林-巴利综合征早期诊断的神经生理学标准的诊断准确性:一项前瞻性研究。

Diagnostic accuracy of neurophysiological criteria for early diagnosis of AIDP: A prospective study.

作者信息

Scarpino Maenia, Lolli Francesco, Carrai Riccardo, Lanzo Giovanni, Spalletti Maddalena, Barilaro Alessandro, Fattapposta Francesco, Amantini Aldo, Grippo Antonello

机构信息

Neuromuscolar Department, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy; IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Neurophysiol Clin. 2016 Feb;46(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of electrodiagnostic (EDX) criteria for the early detection and characterization of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in clinical practice.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in patients referred for an EDX exam with clinical suspicion of GBS. We evaluated four sets of neurophysiological criteria and four neurophysiological tests among those recently proposed for the early diagnosis of GBS.

RESULTS

We recruited 84 patients. Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (AIDP) was the final diagnosis in 23 patients. No axonal forms were found. The best sensitivity was obtained using Rajabally et al.'s criteria (82.1%), whereas the specificity was 90.0% for Ho et al.'s and Hadden et al.'s criteria and 100% for the Dutch GBS study group and Rajabally's criteria. Regarding the neurophysiological tests proposed for early diagnosis, the sensitivity ranged from 16.6 to 100%, whereas specificity ranged from 73.1 to 98.3%.

CONCLUSION

The Dutch GBS study group and Rajabally et al.'s criteria showed an optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for clinical practice, although with a slightly higher sensitivity for Rajabally et al.'s criteria. None of the neurophysiological parameters recently proposed for early diagnosis have good diagnostic accuracy for clinical application.

SIGNIFICANCE

In a real clinical setting with patients referred by neurologists and emergency doctors, an EDX study performed within a week of symptom onset supports the diagnosis of AIDP in 82% of cases.

摘要

目的

评估电诊断(EDX)标准在临床实践中早期检测和鉴别吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)的诊断准确性。

方法

我们对因临床怀疑GBS而转诊进行EDX检查的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。我们评估了最近提出的用于GBS早期诊断的四套神经生理学标准和四项神经生理学测试。

结果

我们招募了84名患者。最终诊断为急性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(AIDP)的有23例。未发现轴索性类型。使用拉贾巴利等人的标准获得了最佳敏感性(82.1%),而霍等人、哈登等人的标准特异性为90.0%,荷兰GBS研究组和拉贾巴利的标准特异性为100%。关于为早期诊断提出的神经生理学测试,敏感性范围为16.6%至100%,而特异性范围为73.1%至98.3%。

结论

荷兰GBS研究组和拉贾巴利等人的标准在临床实践中显示出敏感性和特异性的最佳组合,尽管拉贾巴利等人的标准敏感性略高。最近提出的用于早期诊断的神经生理学参数均没有良好的临床应用诊断准确性。

意义

在神经科医生和急诊科医生转诊患者的实际临床环境中,在症状出现一周内进行的EDX研究在82%的病例中支持AIDP的诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验