Vasikaran Samuel D, Chubb S A Paul
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 102-118 Murdoch Drive, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
School of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA, 6009, Australia.
Endocrine. 2016 May;52(2):222-5. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-0900-2. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
The purpose of the present study was to examine of the current role of bone turnover markers (BTMs) in the management of osteoporosis. Perusal of the literature examines the available evidence for the utility of BTMs for decision to treat and for the monitoring of treatment for osteoporosis. There is no evidence for the use of BTMs for fracture risk calculation, decision to treat or for treatment selection. A very abnormal BTM value may be a clue to the presence of bone pathology other than uncomplicated osteoporosis. Whilst changes to BTMs following various osteoporosis treatments are well defined, their utility in monitoring individual patients has been less well established. Some fracture outcome-based data exist for the use of u-NTX target of <21 nmol BCE/mmol for antiresorptive therapy; the equivalent s-CTX level is ~250 ng/L. Suboptimal BTM response to treatment may indicate non-compliance or the presence of secondary causes of osteoporosis which may need addressing. Studies are needed to establish treatment targets based on fracture outcomes for commonly used BTMs for each established osteoporosis therapy.
本研究的目的是探讨骨转换标志物(BTMs)在骨质疏松症管理中的当前作用。查阅文献以研究BTMs在骨质疏松症治疗决策和治疗监测中的有用性的现有证据。没有证据表明BTMs可用于骨折风险计算、治疗决策或治疗选择。非常异常的BTM值可能提示存在除单纯性骨质疏松症之外的骨病理情况。虽然各种骨质疏松症治疗后BTMs的变化已明确,但它们在监测个体患者方面的实用性尚未得到充分确立。对于抗吸收治疗使用u-NTX目标<21 nmol BCE/mmol,存在一些基于骨折结局的数据;等效的s-CTX水平约为250 ng/L。治疗后BTM反应欠佳可能表明不依从或存在可能需要解决的骨质疏松症继发原因。需要开展研究,基于每种已确立的骨质疏松症治疗常用BTMs的骨折结局来确定治疗目标。