Paz Luciano, Insabato Andrea, Zylberberg Ariel, Deco Gustavo, Sigman Mariano
Integrative Neuroscience Laboratory, IFIBA, CONICET and Physics Department, FCEyN, UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 24;6:21830. doi: 10.1038/srep21830.
Models that integrate sensory evidence to a threshold can explain task accuracy, response times and confidence, yet it is still unclear how confidence is encoded in the brain. Classic models assume that confidence is encoded in some form of balance between the evidence integrated in favor and against the selected option. However, recent experiments that measure the sensory evidence's influence on choice and confidence contradict these classic models. We propose that the decision is taken by many loosely coupled modules each of which represent a stochastic sample of the sensory evidence integral. Confidence is then encoded in the dispersion between modules. We show that our proposal can account for the well established relations between confidence, and stimuli discriminability and reaction times, as well as the fluctuations influence on choice and confidence.
将感官证据整合到阈值的模型可以解释任务准确性、反应时间和信心,但目前仍不清楚信心在大脑中是如何编码的。经典模型假设,信心是以支持和反对所选选项的整合证据之间某种形式的平衡来编码的。然而,最近测量感官证据对选择和信心影响的实验与这些经典模型相矛盾。我们提出,决策是由许多松散耦合的模块做出的,每个模块都代表感官证据积分的一个随机样本。然后,信心在模块之间的离散度中编码。我们表明,我们的提议可以解释信心、刺激可辨别性和反应时间之间已确立的关系,以及波动对选择和信心的影响。