Suppr超能文献

体重偏见内化量表:使用替代体重状况分类方法的心理测量特性。

Weight Bias Internalization Scale: Psychometric properties using alternative weight status classification approaches.

作者信息

Lee Morgan S, Dedrick Robert F

机构信息

University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.

出版信息

Body Image. 2016 Jun;17:25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

Abstract

The Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS) was developed to facilitate systematic investigation of internalized weight bias, but the English version has not undergone confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Additionally, it is unclear whether the measure can be used when participants are grouped based on self-perceived versus body mass index (BMI)-based weight status. The present study evaluated the WBIS in a sample of 243 male and female undergraduate students who were overweight/obese as classified by self-perception or BMI. After exclusion of Item 1 due to poor item-to-total correlation, Cronbach's alphas were .92 and .94 for the perception-based and BMI-based groupings, respectively. CFAs using the reduced 10-item scale with addition of modifications for correlated errors resulted in acceptable model fit for the one-factor model in both groupings. Findings suggest psychometric properties of the modified WBIS are acceptable and are similar for overweight/obese participants grouped by either perceived weight status or BMI.

摘要

体重偏见内化量表(WBIS)的开发是为了便于对内化的体重偏见进行系统研究,但该量表的英文版本尚未经过验证性因素分析(CFA)。此外,当根据自我认知与基于体重指数(BMI)的体重状况对参与者进行分组时,该测量方法是否可用尚不清楚。本研究在243名根据自我认知或BMI分类为超重/肥胖的男女本科生样本中对WBIS进行了评估。由于项目与总分的相关性较差,排除了第1项后,基于认知分组和基于BMI分组的克朗巴哈系数分别为0.92和0.94。使用减少为10项的量表并对相关误差进行修正的CFA结果显示,两种分组中的单因素模型拟合度均可接受。研究结果表明,修改后的WBIS的心理测量特性是可接受的,并且对于根据感知体重状况或BMI分组的超重/肥胖参与者来说是相似的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验