Malek-Ahmadi Michael
Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2016 Oct-Dec;30(4):324-330. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000145.
The initiation of Alzheimer disease (AD) prevention studies has placed greater emphasis on the need to accurately detect individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) given their increased risk for developing AD. Several studies reporting on the incidence and prevalence of aMCI have also found that a substantial number of aMCI cases at baseline assessments revert to normal cognition at subsequent assessments. This instability presents a major challenge to intervention studies aimed at preventing the onset of clinical symptoms associated with aMCI. Reversion rates from 25 studies were used for this meta-analysis which found an overall reversion rate of approximately 24%. When the studies were separated by their setting (community vs. clinic), substantial differences in reversion rates were noted with clinic-based studies having a much lower reversion rate (14%) than community-based studies (31%). North American and European studies had high heterogeneity of reversion rates, whereas Asian studies had moderate levels of heterogeneity and significantly lower rates of reversion. Continued improvement in diagnostic and classification methodologies may help in more accurately identifying aMCI cases which are less likely to revert to normal cognition.
鉴于遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的风险增加,AD预防研究的启动更加注重准确检测此类个体的必要性。多项关于aMCI发病率和患病率的研究还发现,在基线评估时大量的aMCI病例在后续评估中恢复为正常认知。这种不稳定性给旨在预防与aMCI相关临床症状发作的干预研究带来了重大挑战。本荟萃分析使用了25项研究的恢复率,发现总体恢复率约为24%。当根据研究背景(社区与诊所)进行分类时,发现恢复率存在显著差异,基于诊所的研究恢复率(14%)远低于基于社区的研究(31%)。北美和欧洲的研究恢复率异质性较高,而亚洲的研究异质性中等且恢复率显著较低。诊断和分类方法的持续改进可能有助于更准确地识别不太可能恢复为正常认知的aMCI病例。