Yu Hai-Hong, Tan Lan, Jiao Meng-Jiao, Lv Yi-Ju, Zhang Xin-Hao, Tan Chen-Chen, Xu Wei
Department of Neurology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao University, Donghai Middle Road, No.5, Qingdao, China.
Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
BMC Med. 2025 May 6;23(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04092-0.
Controversy existed in the prognosis of reversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to normal cognition (NC). We aim to depict the prognostic characteristics of cognition, neuroimaging, and pathology biomarkers, as well as the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia for MCI reverters.
A total of 796 non-demented participants (mean age = 73.3 years, female = 54.4%, MCI = 55.7%), who were divided into MCI reverters (n = 109), stable MCI (n = 334), and stable NC (n = 353) based on 2-year diagnosis changes, were subsequently followed up for 6 years. Cox proportional hazard regression models were applied to assess the AD dementia hazard. Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the differences in changing rates of cognitive scores, brain volumes, brain metabolism, and AD biomarkers among three groups.
The 2-year MCI reversion rate was 18.17%. MCI reversion was associated with an 89.6% lower risk of AD dementia (HR = 0.104, 95% confidence interval = [0.033, 0.335], p < 0.001) than stable MCI. No significant difference in incident AD risk was found between MCI reverters and stable NC (p = 0.533). Compared to stable MCI, reverters exhibited slower decreases in cognitive performance (false discovery rate corrected p value [FDR-Q] < 0.050), brain volumes (FDR-Q < 0.050), brain metabolism (FDR-Q < 0.001), and levels of cerebrospinal fluid β-amyloid (FDR-Q = 0.008). The above-mentioned differences were not found between MCI reverters and stable NC (FDR-Q > 0.050).
Reversion from MCI to NC predicts a favorable prognosis of pathological, neurodegenerative, and cognitive trajectory.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)向正常认知(NC)逆转的预后存在争议。我们旨在描述认知、神经影像学和病理学生物标志物的预后特征,以及MCI逆转者患阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆的风险。
共有796名非痴呆参与者(平均年龄=73.3岁,女性=54.4%,MCI=55.7%),根据2年的诊断变化分为MCI逆转者(n=109)、稳定MCI(n=334)和稳定NC(n=353),随后进行了6年的随访。应用Cox比例风险回归模型评估AD痴呆风险。线性混合效应模型用于评估三组之间认知分数、脑容量、脑代谢和AD生物标志物变化率的差异。
2年MCI逆转率为18.17%。与稳定MCI相比,MCI逆转与AD痴呆风险降低89.6%相关(HR=0.104,95%置信区间=[0.033,0.335],p<0.001)。MCI逆转者与稳定NC之间的AD发病风险无显著差异(p=0.533)。与稳定MCI相比,逆转者在认知表现(错误发现率校正p值[FDR-Q]<0.050)、脑容量(FDR-Q<0.050)、脑代谢(FDR-Q<0.001)和脑脊液β-淀粉样蛋白水平(FDR-Q=0.008)方面下降较慢。MCI逆转者与稳定NC之间未发现上述差异(FDR-Q>0.050)。
从MCI逆转至NC预示着病理、神经退行性变和认知轨迹的良好预后。