Suppr超能文献

门诊心脏护理的实践水平差异及其与预后的关联。

Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.

作者信息

Clough Jeffrey D, Rajkumar Rahul, Crim Matthew T, Ott Lesli S, Desai Nihar R, Conway Patrick H, Maresh Sha, Kahvecioglu Daver C, Krumholz Harlan M

机构信息

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23;5(2):e002594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002594.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilization of cardiac services varies across regions and hospitals, yet little is known regarding variation in the intensity of outpatient cardiac care across cardiology physician practices or the association with clinical endpoints, an area of potential importance to promote efficient care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 7 160 732 Medicare beneficiaries who received services from 5635 cardiology practices in 2012. Beneficiaries were assigned to practices providing the plurality of office visits, and practices were ranked and assigned to quartiles using the ratio of observed to predicted annual payments per beneficiary for common cardiac services (outpatient intensity index). The median (interquartile range) outpatient intensity index was 1.00 (0.81-1.24). Mean payments for beneficiaries attributed to practices in the highest (Q4) and lowest (Q1) quartile of outpatient intensity were: all cardiac payments (Q4 $1272 vs Q1 $581; ratio, 2.2); cardiac catheterization (Q4 $215 vs Q1 $64; ratio, 3.4); myocardial perfusion imaging (Q4 $253 vs Q1 $83; ratio, 3.0); and electrophysiology device procedures (Q4 $353 vs Q1 $142; ratio, 2.5). The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for 1 incremental quartile of outpatient intensity for each outcome was: cardiac surgical/procedural hospitalization (1.09 [1.09, 1.10]); cardiac medical hospitalization (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]); noncardiac hospitalization (0.99 [0.99, 0.99]); and death at 1 year (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]).

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation in the intensity of outpatient care exists at the cardiology practice level, and higher intensity is not associated with reduced mortality or hospitalizations. Outpatient cardiac care is a potentially important target for efforts to improve efficiency in the Medicare population.

摘要

背景

心脏服务的利用情况在不同地区和医院存在差异,但对于不同心脏病学医生诊所门诊心脏护理强度的差异以及与临床终点的关联了解甚少,而这一领域对于促进高效护理具有潜在重要性。

方法与结果

我们纳入了2012年从5635家心脏病学诊所接受服务的7160732名医疗保险受益人。受益人被分配到提供多数门诊就诊的诊所,并根据每位受益人的常见心脏服务观察到的与预测的年度支付比例(门诊强度指数)对诊所进行排名并分为四分位数。门诊强度指数的中位数(四分位间距)为1.00(0.81 - 1.24)。归因于门诊强度最高(第4四分位数)和最低(第1四分位数)四分位数诊所的受益人平均支付费用如下:所有心脏支付费用(第4四分位数为1272美元,第1四分位数为581美元;比值为2.2);心导管插入术(第4四分位数为215美元,第1四分位数为64美元;比值为3.4);心肌灌注成像(第4四分位数为253美元,第1四分位数为83美元;比值为3.0);以及电生理设备操作(第4四分位数为353美元,第1四分位数为142美元;比值为2.5)。每个结局门诊强度每增加一个四分位数的调整后比值比(95%可信区间)为:心脏外科/手术住院(1.09 [1.09, 1.10]);心脏内科住院(1.00 [0.99, 1.00]);非心脏住院(0.99 [0.99, 0.99]);以及1年时死亡(1.00 [0.99, 1.00])。

结论

在心脏病学诊所层面,门诊护理强度存在显著差异,且更高强度与死亡率或住院率降低无关。门诊心脏护理可能是改善医疗保险人群效率努力的一个重要潜在目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511a/4802452/d5aa3c657edf/JAH3-5-e002594-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验