• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊心脏护理的实践水平差异及其与预后的关联。

Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.

作者信息

Clough Jeffrey D, Rajkumar Rahul, Crim Matthew T, Ott Lesli S, Desai Nihar R, Conway Patrick H, Maresh Sha, Kahvecioglu Daver C, Krumholz Harlan M

机构信息

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23;5(2):e002594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002594.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.115.002594
PMID:26908402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4802452/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilization of cardiac services varies across regions and hospitals, yet little is known regarding variation in the intensity of outpatient cardiac care across cardiology physician practices or the association with clinical endpoints, an area of potential importance to promote efficient care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 7 160 732 Medicare beneficiaries who received services from 5635 cardiology practices in 2012. Beneficiaries were assigned to practices providing the plurality of office visits, and practices were ranked and assigned to quartiles using the ratio of observed to predicted annual payments per beneficiary for common cardiac services (outpatient intensity index). The median (interquartile range) outpatient intensity index was 1.00 (0.81-1.24). Mean payments for beneficiaries attributed to practices in the highest (Q4) and lowest (Q1) quartile of outpatient intensity were: all cardiac payments (Q4 $1272 vs Q1 $581; ratio, 2.2); cardiac catheterization (Q4 $215 vs Q1 $64; ratio, 3.4); myocardial perfusion imaging (Q4 $253 vs Q1 $83; ratio, 3.0); and electrophysiology device procedures (Q4 $353 vs Q1 $142; ratio, 2.5). The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for 1 incremental quartile of outpatient intensity for each outcome was: cardiac surgical/procedural hospitalization (1.09 [1.09, 1.10]); cardiac medical hospitalization (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]); noncardiac hospitalization (0.99 [0.99, 0.99]); and death at 1 year (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]).

CONCLUSION

Substantial variation in the intensity of outpatient care exists at the cardiology practice level, and higher intensity is not associated with reduced mortality or hospitalizations. Outpatient cardiac care is a potentially important target for efforts to improve efficiency in the Medicare population.

摘要

背景

心脏服务的利用情况在不同地区和医院存在差异,但对于不同心脏病学医生诊所门诊心脏护理强度的差异以及与临床终点的关联了解甚少,而这一领域对于促进高效护理具有潜在重要性。

方法与结果

我们纳入了2012年从5635家心脏病学诊所接受服务的7160732名医疗保险受益人。受益人被分配到提供多数门诊就诊的诊所,并根据每位受益人的常见心脏服务观察到的与预测的年度支付比例(门诊强度指数)对诊所进行排名并分为四分位数。门诊强度指数的中位数(四分位间距)为1.00(0.81 - 1.24)。归因于门诊强度最高(第4四分位数)和最低(第1四分位数)四分位数诊所的受益人平均支付费用如下:所有心脏支付费用(第4四分位数为1272美元,第1四分位数为581美元;比值为2.2);心导管插入术(第4四分位数为215美元,第1四分位数为64美元;比值为3.4);心肌灌注成像(第4四分位数为253美元,第1四分位数为83美元;比值为3.0);以及电生理设备操作(第4四分位数为353美元,第1四分位数为142美元;比值为2.5)。每个结局门诊强度每增加一个四分位数的调整后比值比(95%可信区间)为:心脏外科/手术住院(1.09 [1.09, 1.10]);心脏内科住院(1.00 [0.99, 1.00]);非心脏住院(0.99 [0.99, 0.99]);以及1年时死亡(1.00 [0.99, 1.00])。

结论

在心脏病学诊所层面,门诊护理强度存在显著差异,且更高强度与死亡率或住院率降低无关。门诊心脏护理可能是改善医疗保险人群效率努力的一个重要潜在目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511a/4802452/d5aa3c657edf/JAH3-5-e002594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511a/4802452/d5aa3c657edf/JAH3-5-e002594-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/511a/4802452/d5aa3c657edf/JAH3-5-e002594-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.门诊心脏护理的实践水平差异及其与预后的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Feb 23;5(2):e002594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002594.
2
Variation in Specialty Outpatient Care Patterns in the Medicare Population.医疗保险人群专科门诊护理模式的差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(11):1278-1286. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3745-8. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Evaluation of the Statewide Variability in the Current Role of Different Specialties in Lower Extremity Endovascular Revascularization for Medicare Beneficiaries.对医疗保险受益人的下肢血管腔内血管再通术不同专业当前作用的全州范围变异性评估。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Feb;30(2):250-256.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.10.029.
4
Geographic Variation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participation in Medicare and Veterans Affairs Populations: Opportunity for Improvement.医疗保险和退伍军人事务人群中心脏康复参与的地域差异:改善的机会。
Circulation. 2018 May 1;137(18):1899-1908. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029471. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
5
The Effect of Clinical Care Location on Clinical Outcomes After Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Medicare Beneficiaries.临床护理地点对 Medicare 受益人的外周血管介入治疗后临床结果的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):1161-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.033.
6
Outpatient healthcare utilization 30 days before and after hospitalization for heart failure in France: Contribution of the national healthcare database (Systèmenationaldesdonnéesdesanté).法国心力衰竭住院前后 30 天的门诊医疗利用情况:国家卫生数据库(Systèmenationaldesdonnéesdesanté)的贡献。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 Jun-Jul;113(6-7):401-419. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.11.011. Epub 2020 May 27.
7
The disproportionate growth of office-based atherectomy.基于办公室的斑块旋切术的不成比例增长。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.08.112. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
8
Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥190mg/dL患者降脂治疗使用情况的差异:来自国家心血管数据注册库 - 实践创新与临床卓越注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 May;11(5):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004652.
9
Temporal Trends and Variation in Early Scheduled Follow-Up After a Hospitalization for Heart Failure: Findings from Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure.心力衰竭住院后早期计划随访的时间趋势和变化:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure 的研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002344.
10
Association of Outpatient Practice-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Quality of Care and Outcomes Among Older Adults With Coronary Artery Disease: Implications for Value-Based Payment.门诊实践层面的社会经济劣势与老年冠心病患者医疗质量及预后的关联:对基于价值的支付的启示
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e005977. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005977. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Accountable Care Organization Participation and Cardiovascular Care Quality.accountable care organization参与和心血管护理质量。 (注:Accountable Care Organization常见释义为“ accountable care organization”,直译为“ accountable care organization”,在医疗领域常指“ accountable care organization”,是一种新型医疗服务模式,强调医疗服务的协调与整合,以提高医疗质量和控制成本。为使译文更符合中文表达习惯,可调整为“ accountable care organization参与和心血管护理质量。 ” )
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0381.
2
Practice variation and practice guidelines: Attitudes of generalist and specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.实践差异与实践指南:全科医生、专科医生、执业护士及医师助理的态度
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):e0191943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191943. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Comorbidities and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients With and Without an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention.植入式心脏复律除颤器用于一级预防的心力衰竭患者合并症与预后的关系
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 6;4(8):e002061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002061.
2
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use Among Medicare Patients With Low Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后射血分数降低的 Medicare 患者中植入型心律转复除颤器的使用情况。
JAMA. 2015;313(24):2433-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6409.
3
The repeal of Medicare's sustainable growth rate for physician payment.
废除医疗保险对医生支付的可持续增长率。
JAMA. 2015 May 26;313(20):2025-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4550.
4
Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data.美国医生的决策及心脏负荷试验使用趋势:重复横断面数据分析
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 7;161(7):482-90. doi: 10.7326/M14-0296.
5
Variation in patients' perceptions of elective percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease: cross sectional study.稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者对选择性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗认知的差异:横断面研究
BMJ. 2014 Sep 8;349:g5309. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5309.
6
Patient selection for diagnostic coronary angiography and hospital-level percutaneous coronary intervention appropriateness: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.患者选择诊断性冠状动脉造影和医院水平经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的适宜性:来自国家心血管数据登记处的见解。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1630-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3904.
7
Prevalence and predictors of nonobstructive coronary artery disease identified with coronary angiography in contemporary clinical practice.在当代临床实践中,通过冠状动脉造影检查发现的非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的患病率和预测因素。
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):846-52.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
8
The Medicare physician-data release--context and rationale.医疗保险医师数据发布——背景与理由。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):99-101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1405026. Epub 2014 May 28.
9
Caution advised: Medicare's physician-payment data release.建议谨慎对待:医疗保险医师支付数据发布。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):101-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1405322. Epub 2014 May 28.
10
HRS/ACC/AHA expert consensus statement on the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients who are not included or not well represented in clinical trials.美国心力衰竭学会/美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会关于在临床试验中未纳入或代表性不足的患者中使用植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的专家共识声明
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Sep 16;64(11):1143-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.008. Epub 2014 May 9.