Genre Andrea, Russo Giulia
Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin Turin, Italy.
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 16;7:96. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00096. eCollection 2016.
Recent years have witnessed major advances in our knowledge of plant mutualistic symbioses such as the rhizobium-legume symbiosis (RLS) and arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM). Some of these findings caused the revision of longstanding hypotheses, but one of the most solid theories is that a conserved set of plant proteins rules the transduction of symbiotic signals from beneficial glomeromycetes and rhizobia in a so-called common symbiotic pathway (CSP). Nevertheless, the picture still misses several elements, and a few crucial points remain unclear. How does one common pathway discriminate between - at least - two symbionts? Can we exclude that microbes other than AM fungi and rhizobia also use this pathway to communicate with their host plants? We here discuss the possibility that our current view is biased by a long-lasting focus on legumes, whose ability to develop both AM and RLS is an exception among plants and a recent innovation in their evolution; investigations in non-legumes are starting to place legume symbiotic signaling in a broader perspective. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that CSP proteins act in a wider scenario of symbiotic and non-symbiotic signaling. Overall, evidence is accumulating in favor of distinct activities for CSP proteins in AM and RLS, depending on the molecular and cellular context where they act.
近年来,我们对植物互利共生关系的认识取得了重大进展,例如根瘤菌与豆科植物的共生关系(RLS)以及丛枝菌根(AM)。其中一些发现导致了长期以来假说的修正,但最可靠的理论之一是,一组保守的植物蛋白在所谓的共同共生途径(CSP)中调控来自有益球囊霉和根瘤菌的共生信号转导。然而,情况仍缺少一些要素,一些关键点仍不明确。一条共同途径如何区分至少两种共生体?我们能否排除除了AM真菌和根瘤菌之外的微生物也利用这条途径与它们的宿主植物进行交流?我们在此讨论一种可能性,即我们目前的观点因长期关注豆科植物而存在偏差,豆科植物同时发展AM和RLS的能力在植物中是个例外,且是其进化过程中的一项近期创新;对非豆科植物的研究正开始将豆科植物的共生信号置于更广阔的视角。此外,最近的研究表明,CSP蛋白在更广泛的共生和非共生信号场景中发挥作用。总体而言,越来越多的证据表明,取决于CSP蛋白发挥作用的分子和细胞背景,它们在AM和RLS中具有不同的活性。