Brendbekken Randi, Eriksen Hege R, Grasdal Astrid, Harris Anette, Hagen Eli M, Tangen Tone
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway.
Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Bergen University College, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway.
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Mar;27(1):82-91. doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9634-5.
This randomized clinical trial was performed to compare the effect of a new multidisciplinary intervention (MI) programme to a brief intervention (BI) programme on return to work (RTW), fully and partly, at a 12-month and 24-month follow-up in patients on long-term sick leave due to musculoskeletal pain.
Patients (n = 284, mean age 41.3 years, 53.9 % women) who were sick-listed with musculoskeletal pain and referred to a specialist clinic in physical rehabilitation were randomized to MI (n = 141) or BI (n = 143). The MI included the use of a visual educational tool, which facilitated patient-therapist communication and self-management. The MI also applied one more profession, more therapist time and a comprehensive focus on the psychosocial factors, particularly the working conditions, compared to a BI. The main features of the latter are a thorough medical, educational examination, a brief cognitive assessment based on the non-injury model, and a recommendation to return to normal activity as soon as possible.
The number of patients with full-time RTW developed similarly in the two groups. The patients receiving MI had a higher probability to partly RTW during the first 7 months of the follow-up compared to the BI-group.
There were no differences between the groups on full-time RTW during the 24 months. However, the results indicate that MI hastens the return to work process in long-term sick leave through the increased use of partial sick leave.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov with the registration number NCT01346423.
本随机临床试验旨在比较一种新的多学科干预(MI)方案与一种简短干预(BI)方案,对因肌肉骨骼疼痛而长期病假的患者在12个月和24个月随访时完全和部分恢复工作(RTW)的影响。
因肌肉骨骼疼痛而列入病假名单并被转诊至物理康复专科诊所的患者(n = 284,平均年龄41.3岁,53.9%为女性)被随机分为MI组(n = 141)或BI组(n = 143)。MI包括使用一种视觉教育工具,该工具促进了患者与治疗师之间的沟通以及自我管理。与BI相比,MI还增加了一名专业人员、更多治疗师时间,并全面关注心理社会因素,尤其是工作条件。后者的主要特点是进行全面的医学、教育检查,基于非损伤模型进行简短的认知评估,并建议尽快恢复正常活动。
两组中全职恢复工作的患者数量发展情况相似。与BI组相比,接受MI的患者在随访的前7个月内部分恢复工作的可能性更高。
在24个月期间,两组在全职恢复工作方面没有差异。然而,结果表明,MI通过增加部分病假的使用,加速了长期病假患者的恢复工作进程。