MacDonald M Ethan, Forkert Nils D, Pike G Bruce, Frayne Richard
Departments of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0149930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149930. eCollection 2016.
Volume flow rate (VFR) measurements based on phase contrast (PC)-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets have spatially varying bias due to eddy current induced phase errors. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of phase errors in time averaged PC-MR imaging of the cerebral vasculature and explore the effects of three common correction schemes (local bias correction (LBC), local polynomial correction (LPC), and whole brain polynomial correction (WBPC)).
Measurements of the eddy current induced phase error from a static phantom were first obtained. In thirty healthy human subjects, the methods were then assessed in background tissue to determine if local phase offsets could be removed. Finally, the techniques were used to correct VFR measurements in cerebral vessels and compared statistically.
In the phantom, phase error was measured to be <2.1 ml/s per pixel and the bias was reduced with the correction schemes. In background tissue, the bias was significantly reduced, by 65.6% (LBC), 58.4% (LPC) and 47.7% (WBPC) (p < 0.001 across all schemes). Correction did not lead to significantly different VFR measurements in the vessels (p = 0.997). In the vessel measurements, the three correction schemes led to flow measurement differences of -0.04 ± 0.05 ml/s, 0.09 ± 0.16 ml/s, and -0.02 ± 0.06 ml/s. Although there was an improvement in background measurements with correction, there was no statistical difference between the three correction schemes (p = 0.242 in background and p = 0.738 in vessels).
While eddy current induced phase errors can vary between hardware and sequence configurations, our results showed that the impact is small in a typical brain PC-MR protocol and does not have a significant effect on VFR measurements in cerebral vessels.
基于相位对比(PC)磁共振(MR)成像数据集的体积流量率(VFR)测量由于涡流引起的相位误差而存在空间变化偏差。本研究的目的是评估相位误差在脑血管理论平均PC-MR成像中的影响,并探讨三种常见校正方案(局部偏差校正(LBC)、局部多项式校正(LPC)和全脑多项式校正(WBPC))的效果。
首先从静态体模获得涡流引起的相位误差测量值。然后在30名健康人类受试者的背景组织中评估这些方法,以确定局部相位偏移是否可以消除。最后,使用这些技术校正脑血管中的VFR测量值并进行统计学比较。
在体模中,测得的相位误差<2.1 ml/s/像素,并且偏差通过校正方案得以降低。在背景组织中,偏差显著降低,LBC降低65.6%,LPC降低58.4%,WBPC降低47.7%(所有方案p<0.001)。校正后血管中的VFR测量值没有显著差异(p = 0.997)。在血管测量中,三种校正方案导致的流量测量差异分别为-0.04±0.05 ml/s、0.09±0.16 ml/s和-0.02±0.06 ml/s。虽然校正后背景测量有改善,但三种校正方案之间没有统计学差异(背景中p = 0.242,血管中p = 0.738)。
虽然涡流引起的相位误差可能因硬件和序列配置而异,但我们的结果表明,在典型的脑部PC-MR协议中,其影响较小,并且对脑血管中的VFR测量没有显著影响。