Mahmoudi Elham, Swiatek Peter R, Chung Kevin C, Ayanian John Z
Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School; and the Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):576e-585e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479969.14557.9d.
Traumatic finger/thumb amputations are some of the most prevalent traumatic injuries affecting Americans each year. Rates of replantation after traumatic finger/thumb amputation, however, have been declining steadily across U.S. hospitals, which may make these procedures less accessible to minorities and vulnerable populations. The specific aim of this study was to examine racial variation in finger replantation after traumatic finger/thumb amputation.
Using a two-level hierarchical model, the authors retrospectively compared replantation rates for African American patients with those of whites, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. Patients younger than 65 years with traumatic finger/thumb amputation injuries who sought care at a U.S. trauma center between 2007 and 2012 were included in the study sample.
The authors analyzed 13,129 patients younger than 65 years with traumatic finger/thumb amputation. Replantation rates declined over time from 19 percent to 14 percent (p = 0.004). Adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, African Americans (OR, 0.81; 95 percent CI, 0.66 to 0.99; p = 0.049) were less likely to undergo replantation procedures than whites, and uninsured patients (OR, 0.73; 95 percent CI, 0.62 to 0.84; p < 0.0001) were less likely than those who were privately insured.
Despite advancements in microsurgical techniques and the increasing use of reconstructive surgery in other fields, finger/thumb replantation rates are declining in the United States and vulnerable populations are less likely to undergo replantation after amputation injuries. Regionalization of care for these injuries may not only provide a higher quality care but also reduce variations in treatment.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.
外伤性手指/拇指离断是每年影响美国人的最常见外伤之一。然而,美国各医院外伤性手指/拇指离断后的再植率一直在稳步下降,这可能使少数族裔和弱势群体更难获得这些手术。本研究的具体目的是调查外伤性手指/拇指离断后手指再植的种族差异。
作者使用两级分层模型,回顾性比较了非裔美国患者与白人患者的再植率,并对患者和医院特征进行了调整。2007年至2012年期间在美国创伤中心寻求治疗的65岁以下外伤性手指/拇指离断伤患者被纳入研究样本。
作者分析了13129例65岁以下的外伤性手指/拇指离断患者。再植率随时间从19%下降到14%(p = 0.004)。在对患者和医院特征进行调整后,非裔美国人(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.66至0.99;p = 0.049)接受再植手术的可能性低于白人,未参保患者(OR,0.73;95%CI,0.62至0.84;p < 0.0001)接受再植手术的可能性低于私人参保患者。
尽管显微外科技术有所进步,且重建手术在其他领域的应用日益增加,但美国手指/拇指再植率仍在下降,弱势群体在截肢伤后接受再植手术的可能性较小。对这些损伤进行区域性治疗不仅可以提供更高质量的护理,还可以减少治疗差异。
临床问题/证据级别:风险,III级