• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交接时外科医生的一致性,一项前瞻性队列研究。

Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Hilsden Richard, Moffat Bradley, Knowles Sarah, Parry Neil, Leslie Ken

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada ; Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON Canada.

Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, P.O. Box 5339, London, ON N6A 5A5 Canada ; Department of Critical Care, London, On Canada.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb 24;11:11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6
PMID:26913056
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4765098/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute Care Surgical Teams are responsible for emergent surgical patients, and as such require regular handover and coordination between different surgeons. Despite the recent emergence of this model of care, minimal research has been conducted on the quality of patient handover and no research has attempted to determine the rate of clinical agreement or disagreement among surgeons participating in these teams.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was carried out with our acute care surgical service at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2 to March 31 2012. At the conclusion of the daily morning handover, receiving surgeons were asked to indicate, on provided handover sheets, whether they agreed with the proposed management plan for each patient that was discussed. The specific aspects of care over which they disagreed were also described, and disagreements were classified a priori as major or minor. The primary outcome was the rate of disagreement over the handed over management plan.

RESULTS

Six staff surgeons agreed to participate and a total of 417 unique patients were handed over during the study period. For the primary outcome, a total of 41 disagreements were recorded for a disagreement rate of 9.8 %. 15 of the 41 disagreements were classified as major, for a major disagreement rate of 3.6 %. Consultant to consultant disagreements were classified as major disagreements 63 % of the time, whereas consultant to resident disagreements were classified as major 31 % of the time (P = 0.217). On average, the age of patients for which a clinical disagreement occurred were older; 63 vs. 57 (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the frequency of handovers in clinical practice, little research has been conducted to determine the rate of disagreement over patient management among surgeons participating working in academic centers. This study demonstrated that the rate of clinical disagreement is low among surgeons working in an tertiary care teaching hospital.

摘要

背景

急性护理外科团队负责急诊手术患者,因此不同外科医生之间需要定期进行交接和协调。尽管这种护理模式最近才出现,但关于患者交接质量的研究极少,也没有研究试图确定参与这些团队的外科医生之间临床意见一致或不一致的发生率。

方法

2012年1月2日至3月31日,在一家三级护理教学医院对我们的急性护理外科服务进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在每日晨间交接结束时,要求接收的外科医生在提供的交接表上表明他们是否同意针对所讨论的每位患者提出的管理计划。还描述了他们不同意的具体护理方面,并将分歧预先分类为主要或次要。主要结局是对交接的管理计划的分歧率。

结果

六位外科 staff 医生同意参与,研究期间共交接了417例不同的患者。对于主要结局,共记录了41例分歧,分歧率为9.8%。41例分歧中有15例被分类为主要分歧,主要分歧率为3.6%。顾问之间的分歧63%的时间被分类为主要分歧,而顾问与住院医生之间的分歧31%的时间被分类为主要分歧(P = 0.217)。发生临床分歧的患者平均年龄较大;63岁对57岁(P < 0.05)。

结论

尽管临床实践中交接频繁,但很少有研究确定在学术中心工作的外科医生之间对患者管理的分歧率。本研究表明,在一家三级护理教学医院工作的外科医生中临床分歧率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bc/4765098/1c7e8d5b4ac4/13017_2016_65_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bc/4765098/68d04fb4f5df/13017_2016_65_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bc/4765098/1c7e8d5b4ac4/13017_2016_65_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bc/4765098/68d04fb4f5df/13017_2016_65_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bc/4765098/1c7e8d5b4ac4/13017_2016_65_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgeon agreement at the time of handover, a prospective cohort study.交接时外科医生的一致性,一项前瞻性队列研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb 24;11:11. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0065-6. eCollection 2016.
2
Team performance during postsurgical patient handovers in paediatric care.儿科术后患者交接过程中的团队表现。
Eur J Pediatr. 2020 Apr;179(4):587-596. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03547-w. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Nursing team leader handover in the intensive care unit contains diverse and inconsistent content: An observational study.重症监护病房护理团队负责人的交接班内容多样且不一致:一项观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Sep;61:165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 May 17.
4
Development of electronic software for the management of trauma patients on the orthopaedic unit.开发骨科病房创伤患者管理电子软件。
Injury. 2009 Apr;40(4):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.006. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
5
Improving patient safety in cardiothoracic surgery: an audit of surgical handover in a tertiary center.提高心胸外科手术患者的安全性:对某三级中心手术交接情况的审计
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 May 27;7:309-10. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S107189. eCollection 2016.
6
Implementation of a new tool to improve the efficacy and safety of surgical handovers.实施一种新工具以提高手术交接的疗效和安全性。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:189-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.019. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
7
Differences in the handover process and perception between nurses and residents in a critical care setting.重症监护环境中护士与住院医师之间在交接班过程和认知上的差异。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Mar;24(5-6):778-85. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12707. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Surgical handover in a tertiary hospital: a working model.三级医院的手术交接:一种工作模式。
Aust Health Rev. 2011 Feb;35(1):14-7. doi: 10.1071/AH09859.
9
Burns surgery handover study: trainees' assessment of current practice in the British Isles.烧伤外科交接班研究:不列颠群岛培训医师对当前实践的评估。
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):509-12. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.11.008. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Acute general surgery in Canada: a survey of current handover practices.加拿大普通外科急腹症:当前交接班实践调查。
Can J Surg. 2013 Jun;56(3):E24-8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.035011.
2
Information transfer and communication in surgery: a systematic review.手术中的信息传递与交流:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):225-39. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e495c2.
3
Acute care surgery: a new strategy for the general surgery patients left behind.急性护理手术:针对被忽视的普通外科患者的一种新策略。
Can J Surg. 2010 Apr;53(2):84-5.
4
General surgery 2.0: the emergence of acute care surgery in Canada.普通外科 2.0:加拿大急危重症外科的出现。
Can J Surg. 2010 Apr;53(2):79-83.
5
Handoffs causing patient harm: a survey of medical and surgical house staff.导致患者伤害的交接班:对内科和外科住院医师的一项调查
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Oct;34(10):563-70. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34071-9.
6
Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients.导致外科手术患者受伤的沟通障碍模式。
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):533-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.010.
7
The concept of acute care surgery: a vision for the not-so-distant future.
Surgery. 2007 Mar;141(3):288-90. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.12.017.
8
Acute care surgery: trauma, critical care, and emergency surgery.急性护理外科:创伤、重症监护与急诊手术。
J Trauma. 2005 Mar;58(3):614-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000159347.03278.e1.
9
Handoff strategies in settings with high consequences for failure: lessons for health care operations.在失败后果严重的环境中的交接策略:医疗保健运营的经验教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16(2):125-32. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh026.
10
Continuity of care: a reconceptualization.连续性护理:一种重新概念化
Med Care Res Rev. 2001 Sep;58(3):255-90. doi: 10.1177/107755870105800301.