Hadi Fatemeh, Khosravi Termeh, Shariat Seyed Vahid, Jalali Nadoushan Amir Hossein
Psychiatrist, Mental Health Research Center, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Mental Health Research Center, Tehran Institute of Psychiatry, School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2015 Nov 17;29:296. eCollection 2015.
Considering the negative consequences of using physical restraints, we conducted this study to identify patients who are more frequently restrained in a psychiatric emergency ward as an initial step to limit the use of restraint to the minimum possible.
This was a retrospective case control study conducted in Iran Psychiatric Hospital in Tehran, Iran. We reviewed the files of 607 patients who were admitted during a one year period using convenience sampling; of them, 186 were in the restrained group and 421 in the unrestrained group.
Surprisingly, no significant difference was found between the restrained and unrestrained groups in demographic characteristics. The patients who were referred because of violence were diagnosed as having methamphetamine induced psychotic disorder or bipolar I disorder in manic 1episode and had a higher odds of being restrained (OR=2.51, OR=1.61, and OR=1.57 respectively). Being restrained was also associated with a longer duration of hospitalization and duration of staying in the emergency ward. Moreover, patients in their first admission were more frequently restrained.
Medical and nursing staff should consider special measures for the patients who are at a higher risk for being restrained. More frequent visits and education for both patients and staff may be effective in reducing the number of physical restraints for these groups of patients.
考虑到使用身体约束措施的负面后果,我们开展了本研究,以确定在精神科急诊病房中更频繁受到约束的患者,作为将约束措施使用限制到尽可能最低程度的第一步。
这是一项在伊朗德黑兰的伊朗精神病医院开展的回顾性病例对照研究。我们采用便利抽样法,回顾了在一年期间收治的607例患者的病历;其中,186例在受约束组,421例在未受约束组。
令人惊讶的是,受约束组和未受约束组在人口统计学特征方面未发现显著差异。因暴力行为就诊的患者被诊断为甲基苯丙胺所致精神障碍或双相I型障碍躁狂发作,且受约束的几率更高(分别为OR=2.51、OR=1.61和OR=1.57)。受约束还与住院时间延长和在急诊病房停留时间延长有关。此外,首次入院的患者更频繁地受到约束。
医护人员应为受约束风险较高的患者考虑特殊措施。对患者和工作人员更频繁地进行探访和教育,可能有助于减少这些患者群体的身体约束使用次数。