Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics Consultation.
作者信息
Magnus David
机构信息
a Stanford University.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1150682.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Finding the Right Tools for Assessing Quality of Clinical Ethics Consultation.寻找评估临床伦理咨询质量的合适工具。
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2016.1150682.
2
A Pilot Evaluation of Portfolios for Quality Attestation of Clinical Ethics Consultants.临床伦理顾问质量认证组合的初步评估。
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):15-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1134705.
3
Ensuring quality in clinical ethics consultations: perspectives of ethicists regarding process and prior training of consultants.确保临床伦理咨询的质量：伦理学家对咨询过程和咨询师前期培训的看法。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):29-31. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750393.
4
Health care ethics consultation competences and standards: a roadmap still needing a compass.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):20-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750396.
5
From unregulated practice to credentialed profession: implementing ethics consultation competencies.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):16-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750389.
6
Health care ethics consultation. Individual consultant or committee model?: pros and cons.
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750394.
7
Answering the call from ASBH's second edition of core competencies in ethics consultation.回应美国生物伦理咨询学会（ASBH）《伦理咨询核心能力》第二版的号召。
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):18-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750390.
8
Ethics expertise and moral authority: is there a difference?伦理专业知识与道德权威：二者有区别吗？
Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(2):27-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.750391.
9
The "quality attestation" process and the risk of the false positive.“质量认证”过程与假阳性风险
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 May-Jun;44(3):19-22. doi: 10.1002/hast.311.
10
Charting the future. Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation.规划未来。临床伦理咨询中的认证、授权、质量和评估。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Nov-Dec;39(6):23-33. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0208.
Zotero 插件