Raczynska Joanna E, Wlodawer Alexander, Jaskolski Mariusz
Center for Biocrystallographic Research, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Macromolecular Crystallography Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, 21702.
Proteins. 2016 Jun;84(6):770-6. doi: 10.1002/prot.25024. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
In a recently published article (Yao, Flight, Rouchka, and Moseley, Proteins 2015;83:1470-1487) the authors proposed novel Zn coordination patterns in protein structures, apparently discovered using an unprejudiced approach to the information collected in the Protein data Bank (PDB), which they advocated as superior to the prior-knowledge-informed paradigm. In our assessment of those propositions we demonstrate here that most, if not all, of the "new" coordination geometries are fictitious, as they are based on incorrectly interpreted protein crystal structures, which in themselves are often not error-free. The flaws of interpretation include partial or wrong Zn sites, missed or wrong ligands, ignored crystal symmetry and ligands, etc. In conclusion, we warn against using this and similar meta-analyses that ignore chemical and crystallographic knowledge, and emphasize the importance of safeguarding structural databases against bad apples. Proteins 2016; 84:770-776. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
在最近发表的一篇文章中(姚、弗莱特、劳奇卡和莫斯利,《蛋白质》,2015年;83卷:1470 - 1487页),作者们提出了蛋白质结构中新型的锌配位模式,显然是通过对蛋白质数据库(PDB)中收集的信息采用无偏见的方法发现的,他们主张这种方法优于基于先验知识的范式。在我们对这些观点的评估中,我们在此证明,大多数(如果不是全部的话)“新”的配位几何结构是虚构的,因为它们基于对蛋白质晶体结构的错误解读,而这些晶体结构本身往往也并非没有错误。解读中的缺陷包括锌位点部分或错误、配体遗漏或错误、忽略晶体对称性和配体等。总之,我们警告不要使用这种以及类似的忽略化学和晶体学知识的荟萃分析,并强调保护结构数据库免受不良数据影响的重要性。《蛋白质》,2016年;84卷:770 - 776页。© 2016威利期刊公司