• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于将55岁作为AJCC/UICC高分化甲状腺癌分期系统中风险分层临界值的国际多机构验证研究。

An International Multi-Institutional Validation of Age 55 Years as a Cutoff for Risk Stratification in the AJCC/UICC Staging System for Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

作者信息

Nixon Iain J, Wang Laura Y, Migliacci Jocelyn C, Eskander Antoine, Campbell Michael J, Aniss Ahmad, Morris Lilah, Vaisman Fernanda, Corbo Rossana, Momesso Denise, Vaisman Mario, Carvalho Andre, Learoyd Diana, Leslie William D, Nason Richard W, Kuk Deborah, Wreesmann Volkert, Morris Luc, Palmer Frank L, Ganly Ian, Patel Snehal G, Singh Bhuvanesh, Tuttle R Michael, Shaha Ashok R, Gönen Mithat, Pathak K Alok, Shen Wen T, Sywak Mark, Kowalski Luis, Freeman Jeremy, Perrier Nancy, Shah Jatin P

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery/Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York.

2 Department of Otolaryngology, Mount Sinai Hospital , Toronto, Canada .

出版信息

Thyroid. 2016 Mar;26(3):373-80. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0315. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1089/thy.2015.0315
PMID:26914539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4790212/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Age is a critical factor in outcome for patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Currently, age 45 years is used as a cutoff in staging, although there is increasing evidence to suggest this may be too low. The aim of this study was to assess the potential for changing the cut point for the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) staging system from 45 years to 55 years based on a combined international patient cohort supplied by individual institutions.

METHODS

A total of 9484 patients were included from 10 institutions. Tumor (T), nodes (N), and metastasis (M) data and age were provided for each patient. The group was stratified by AJCC/UICC stage using age 45 years and age 55 years as cutoffs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate outcomes for disease-specific survival (DSS). Concordance probability estimates (CPE) were calculated to compare the degree of concordance for each model.

RESULTS

Using age 45 years as a cutoff, 10-year DSS rates for stage I-IV were 99.7%, 97.3%, 96.6%, and 76.3%, respectively. Using age 55 years as a cutoff, 10-year DSS rates for stage I-IV were 99.5%, 94.7%, 94.1%, and 67.6%, respectively. The change resulted in 12% of patients being downstaged, and the downstaged group had a 10-year DSS of 97.6%. The change resulted in an increase in CPE from 0.90 to 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

A change in the cutoff age in the current AJCC/UICC staging system from 45 years to 55 years would lead to a downstaging of 12% of patients, and would improve the statistical validity of the model. Such a change would be clinically relevant for thousands of patients worldwide by preventing overstaging of patients with low-risk disease while providing a more realistic estimate of prognosis for those who remain high risk.

摘要

背景

年龄是高分化甲状腺癌患者预后的关键因素。目前,45岁被用作分期的临界值,尽管越来越多的证据表明这个数值可能过低。本研究的目的是基于各机构提供的国际患者联合队列,评估将美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联盟(AJCC/UICC)分期系统的临界值从45岁改为55岁的可能性。

方法

共纳入来自10个机构的9484例患者。为每位患者提供肿瘤(T)、淋巴结(N)和转移(M)数据以及年龄。以45岁和55岁为临界值,根据AJCC/UICC分期对该组患者进行分层。采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算疾病特异性生存率(DSS)的结果。计算一致性概率估计值(CPE)以比较每个模型的一致程度。

结果

以45岁为临界值时,I-IV期的10年DSS率分别为99.7%、97.3%、96.6%和76.3%。以55岁为临界值时,I-IV期的10年DSS率分别为99.5%、94.7%、94.1%和67.6%。这一改变导致12%的患者分期降低,分期降低的组10年DSS为97.6%。这一改变使CPE从0.90提高到0.92。

结论

将当前AJCC/UICC分期系统的临界年龄从45岁改为55岁,将导致12%的患者分期降低,并提高模型的统计有效性。这种改变对全球数千名患者具有临床意义,既能防止低风险疾病患者过度分期,又能为高风险患者提供更现实的预后估计。

相似文献

1
An International Multi-Institutional Validation of Age 55 Years as a Cutoff for Risk Stratification in the AJCC/UICC Staging System for Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.一项关于将55岁作为AJCC/UICC高分化甲状腺癌分期系统中风险分层临界值的国际多机构验证研究。
Thyroid. 2016 Mar;26(3):373-80. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0315. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
Projecting Survival in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Comparison of the Seventh and Eighth Editions of the American Joint Commission on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control Staging Systems in Two Contemporary National Patient Cohorts.预测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的生存情况:在两个当代国家患者队列中比较第七版和第八版美国癌症联合委员会/国际癌症控制联合会分期系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Nov;27(11):1408-1416. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0306. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Finding the Optimal Age Cutoff for the UICC/AJCC TNM Staging System in Patients with Papillary or Follicular Thyroid Cancer.探讨 UICC/AJCC TNM 分期系统中甲状腺乳头状癌或滤泡状癌最佳年龄截断点。
Thyroid. 2021 Jul;31(7):1041-1049. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0615. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
4
Using the American Thyroid Association Risk-Stratification System to Refine and Individualize the American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition Disease-Specific Survival Estimates in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.利用美国甲状腺协会风险分层系统细化和个体化美国癌症联合委员会第八版分化型甲状腺癌疾病特异性生存估计。
Thyroid. 2018 Oct;28(10):1293-1300. doi: 10.1089/thy.2018.0186. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Survival in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Comparing the AJCC Cancer Staging Seventh and Eighth Editions.分化型甲状腺癌的生存:比较 AJCC 癌症分期第七版和第八版。
Thyroid. 2018 Oct;28(10):1301-1310. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0572.
6
Evaluating the use of a two-step age-based cutoff for the UICC/AJCC TNM staging system in patients with papillary or follicular thyroid cancer.评估 UICC/AJCC TNM 分期系统中两步基于年龄的截断值在甲状腺乳头状或滤泡状癌患者中的应用。
Eur J Endocrinol. 2022 Feb 9;186(3):389-397. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-1056.
7
Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.确定高分化甲状腺癌分期中的有效年龄界限。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):410-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4762-2. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
8
Outcome prediction with the revised American joint committee on cancer staging system and American thyroid association guidelines for thyroid cancer.根据修订后的美国癌症联合委员会分期系统和美国甲状腺协会甲状腺癌指南进行预后预测。
Endocrine. 2017 Dec;58(3):495-502. doi: 10.1007/s12020-017-1449-4. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
9
Predicting recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer using the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system.使用第八版 AJCC/UICC 分期系统预测甲状腺乳头状癌的复发。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):889-897. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11145. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Poorly differentiated thyroid cancer in the context of the revised 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines and the Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System (eighth edition).在修订版 2015 年美国甲状腺协会指南和更新的美国联合委员会癌症/肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统(第八版)的背景下的低分化甲状腺癌。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2019 Aug;91(2):331-339. doi: 10.1111/cen.13910. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Thyroid Cancer Staging: Historical Evolution and Analysis From Macrocarcinoma to Microcarcinoma.甲状腺癌分期:从大体癌到微小癌的历史演变与分析
Cureus. 2025 Apr 9;17(4):e81972. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81972. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
A Deep Learning Survival Model for Evaluating the Survival Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.一种用于评估甲状腺乳头状癌生存预后的深度学习生存模型:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17290-0.
3
Disease-specific Mortality of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer With Distant Metastases.分化型甲状腺癌伴远处转移的疾病特异性死亡率
J Endocr Soc. 2025 Feb 24;9(4):bvaf034. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf034. eCollection 2025 Mar 3.
4
Internal jugular vein tumor thrombus in papillary thyroid cancer: our institution's experience and a systematic review of the literature.甲状腺乳头状癌颈内静脉瘤栓:我们机构的经验及文献系统综述
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 25;16:1514455. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1514455. eCollection 2025.
5
Age-stratified deep learning model for thyroid tumor classification: a multicenter diagnostic study.用于甲状腺肿瘤分类的年龄分层深度学习模型:一项多中心诊断研究。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Feb 4. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11386-7.
6
Relative burden of cancer and noncancer mortality among long-term survivors of differentiated thyroid cancer in the US.美国分化型甲状腺癌长期幸存者的癌症和非癌症死亡率的相对负担。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 25;15:1425634. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1425634. eCollection 2024.
7
The Impact of Radioactive Iodine on Disease-Specific Survival in Low-to-Intermediate Risk N1b Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.放射性碘对低至中危N1b型乳头状甲状腺癌疾病特异性生存的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1698-1708. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16388-1. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
8
Prognostic nomogram models for elderly patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma: A population-based study.基于人群的研究:用于老年分化型甲状腺癌患者的预后列线图模型。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 1;103(44):e40381. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040381.
9
Analysis of the ideal cutoff age as a predictor of differentiated thyroid cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析理想的临界年龄作为分化型甲状腺癌预测指标的情况。
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):4278-4289. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-247. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
10
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node size and extra-nodal extension in papillary thyroid carcinoma according to the 9th edition of general rules for the description of thyroid cancer risk stratification: a single center validation study.根据第9版甲状腺癌风险分层描述通用规则,探讨乳头状甲状腺癌转移淋巴结大小及结外侵犯的预后意义:单中心验证研究
Endocrine. 2025 Jan;87(1):188-195. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03974-2. Epub 2024 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining a Valid Age Cutoff in Staging of Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.确定高分化甲状腺癌分期中的有效年龄界限。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(2):410-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4762-2. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
2
Reassessing the NTCTCS Staging Systems for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Including Age at Diagnosis.重新评估分化型甲状腺癌的NTCTCS分期系统,包括诊断时的年龄。
Thyroid. 2015 Oct;25(10):1097-105. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0148. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
3
Survival from Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: What Has Age Got to Do with It?分化型甲状腺癌的生存:年龄与之有何关系?
Thyroid. 2015 Oct;25(10):1106-14. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0104. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
4
Optimal Cutoff Age for Predicting Mortality Associated with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.预测分化型甲状腺癌相关死亡率的最佳截断年龄
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 23;10(6):e0130848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130848. eCollection 2015.
5
Estimating the concordance probability in a survival analysis with a discrete number of risk groups.在具有离散数量风险组的生存分析中估计一致性概率。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2016 Apr;22(2):263-79. doi: 10.1007/s10985-015-9330-3. Epub 2015 May 29.
6
Identifying the most appropriate age threshold for TNM stage grouping of well-differentiated thyroid cancer.确定高分化甲状腺癌TNM分期分组的最合适年龄阈值。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Aug;41(8):1028-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 7.
7
Database and registry research in thyroid cancer: striving for a new and improved national thyroid cancer database.甲状腺癌的数据库与登记研究:致力于打造全新且更完善的国家甲状腺癌数据库。
Thyroid. 2015 Feb;25(2):157-68. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0270. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
8
Effect of reoperation on outcomes in papillary thyroid cancer.再次手术对甲状腺乳头状癌患者结局的影响。
Surgery. 2013 Dec;154(6):1354-61; discussion 1361-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.043.
9
Is above age 45 appropriate for upstaging well-differentiated papillary thyroid cancer?年龄超过 45 岁是否适合升级分化良好型甲状腺乳头状癌?
Endocr Pract. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):995-7. doi: 10.4158/EP13029.OR.
10
The age factor in survival of a population cohort of well-differentiated thyroid cancer.年龄因素对分化型甲状腺癌人群队列生存的影响。
Endocr Connect. 2013 Sep 23;2(3):154-60. doi: 10.1530/EC-13-0056. Print 2013.