Couto Kalliu C, Navarro Victor M, Smith Tatiana R, Wasserman Edward A
Department of Behavioural Science.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):221-227. doi: 10.1037/xan0000099. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
How supervision is arranged can affect the way that humans learn concepts. Yet very little is known about the role that supervision plays in nonhuman concept learning. Prior research in pigeon concept learning has commonly used differential response-reinforcer procedures (involving high-level supervision) to support reliable discrimination and generalization involving from 4 to 16 concurrently presented photographic categories. In the present project, we used contextual cueing, a nondifferential reinforcement procedure (involving low-level supervision), to investigate concept learning in pigeons. We found that pigeons were faster to peck a target stimulus when 8 members from each of 4 categories of black-and-white photographs-dogs, trees, shoes, and keys-correctly cued its location than when they did not. This faster detection of the target also generalized to 4 untrained members from each of the 4 photographic categories. Our results thus pass the prime behavioral tests of conceptualization and suggest that high-level supervision is unnecessary to support concept learning in pigeons.
监督的安排方式会影响人类学习概念的方式。然而,对于监督在非人类概念学习中所起的作用,我们知之甚少。先前关于鸽子概念学习的研究通常使用差异反应强化程序(涉及高级监督)来支持可靠的辨别和泛化,该程序涉及同时呈现4到16个摄影类别。在本项目中,我们使用情境线索化,一种非差异强化程序(涉及低级监督),来研究鸽子的概念学习。我们发现,当来自黑白照片的4个类别(狗、树、鞋子和钥匙)中的每类8个成员正确提示目标刺激的位置时,鸽子啄目标刺激的速度比没有提示时更快。这种对目标的更快检测也推广到了4个摄影类别中每个类别的4个未训练成员。因此,我们的结果通过了概念化的主要行为测试,并表明高级监督对于支持鸽子的概念学习并非必要。