• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

希腊裔单胎胎儿的全国胎儿生长曲线。

National curves of foetal growth in singleton foetuses of Greek origin.

作者信息

Sotiriadis Alexandros, Eleftheriades Makarios, Chatzinikolaou Fotios, Hassiakos Demetrios, Chrousos George P, Pervanidou Panagiota

机构信息

Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Hippokrateion" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

First Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 May;46(5):425-33. doi: 10.1111/eci.12611. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1111/eci.12611
PMID:26915530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Foetal growth monitoring is an essential component of prenatal care with postnatal impact. The aim of the study was to construct reference ranges for foetal biometric parameters in Greek foetuses and to compare them with previously published models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Measurements from 1200 Greek foetuses were used to construct normal curves for biparietal diameter (BPD), occipitofrontal diameter (OFD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), femoral length (FL) and the BPD/FL ratio according to the methodology described by Royston and Wright (1998). The model was validated in a second group of 1200 different foetuses using analysis of the corresponding standardized residuals (z-scores). The z-scores which were derived by our model were compared to those calculated using previously published models from other populations.

RESULTS

BPD, OFD, HC, AC, FL and the BPD/FL ratio are accurately described by simple quadratic equations (R(2) > 0·96 for most of the parameters tested). Statistically significant differences were observed for most of the z-scores when our models were compared to previously published models. Less than 10% of our foetuses were < 5th or > 95th centile of the latter models. About 10% of our foetuses were > 95th centile for FL and HC when the INTERGROWTH-21st formulas were used.

CONCLUSION

We present national foetal biometric references. Using charts from other populations (including INTERGROWTH-21st) may be unrepresentative of local populations and lead to misclassification of foetal growth status.

摘要

背景

胎儿生长监测是产前护理的重要组成部分,对产后也有影响。本研究的目的是构建希腊胎儿生物测量参数的参考范围,并将其与先前发表的模型进行比较。

材料与方法

根据Royston和Wright(1998年)描述的方法,使用1200例希腊胎儿的测量数据构建双顶径(BPD)、枕额径(OFD)、头围(HC)、腹围(AC)、股骨长度(FL)和BPD/FL比值的正态曲线。使用相应标准化残差(z分数)分析,在另一组1200例不同胎儿中对该模型进行验证。将我们模型得出的z分数与使用其他人群先前发表的模型计算得出的z分数进行比较。

结果

BPD、OFD、HC、AC、FL和BPD/FL比值可用简单二次方程准确描述(大多数测试参数的R²>0.96)。当将我们的模型与先前发表的模型进行比较时,大多数z分数存在统计学显著差异。我们的胎儿中,不到10%处于后一种模型的第5百分位数以下或第95百分位数以上。当使用INTERGROWTH-21st公式时,我们约10%的胎儿的FL和HC处于第95百分位数以上。

结论

我们给出了全国性的胎儿生物测量参考值。使用其他人群的图表(包括INTERGROWTH-21st)可能无法代表当地人群,并可能导致胎儿生长状况的错误分类。

相似文献

1
National curves of foetal growth in singleton foetuses of Greek origin.希腊裔单胎胎儿的全国胎儿生长曲线。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 May;46(5):425-33. doi: 10.1111/eci.12611. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
2
Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.用 INTERGROWTH-21st 标准替代中国特定种族胎儿生物测量图表的影响。
BJOG. 2016 Sep;123 Suppl 3:48-55. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14008.
3
Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.波兰人群妊娠20至42周期间的胎儿生物测量
Ginekol Pol. 2008 Nov;79(11):746-53.
4
Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.华裔胎儿的生物测量:双顶径、头围、腹围和股骨长度。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):321-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5192.
5
Fetal biometry assessment with Intergrowth 21st's and Salomon's equations in rural Burkina Faso.采用 Intergrowth 21 方程和 Salomon 方程对布基纳法索农村胎儿进行生物测量评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03183-5.
6
Validation of Reference Charts for Mid-Trimester Fetal Biometry.孕中期胎儿生物测量参考图表的验证
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(1):42-49. doi: 10.1159/000486094. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.孕晚期基于超声的孕周估计
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;48(6):719-726. doi: 10.1002/uog.15894.
8
Conditional standards for the quantification of foetal growth in an ethnic Chinese population: a longitudinal study.中国汉族人群胎儿生长量化的条件标准:一项纵向研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Oct;42(7):2992-2998. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2125290. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
9
Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.胎儿超声生物测量参考值:立陶宛一项前瞻性队列研究的结果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06437-z. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
10
Expected-value bias in routine third-trimester growth scans.常规孕晚期生长扫描中的期望值偏差。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;55(3):375-382. doi: 10.1002/uog.21929.

引用本文的文献

1
Familial Aggregation of a Novel Missense Variant of Gene Associated with Short Extremities: Case Report and Review of the Literature.与短肢相关基因的一种新型错义变异的家族聚集性:病例报告及文献综述
Children (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;9(8):1229. doi: 10.3390/children9081229.
2
Neonatal head circumference by gestation reflects adaptation to maternal body size: comparison of different standards.根据胎龄的新生儿头围反映了对母体体型的适应:不同标准的比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 30;12(1):11057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15128-3.
3
Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.
胎儿超声生物测量参考值:立陶宛一项前瞻性队列研究的结果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Nov;306(5):1503-1517. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06437-z. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
4
Ultrasound Assessment of Fetal Biometry in Iranian Normal Pregnancies.伊朗正常妊娠中胎儿生物测量的超声评估
Int J Prev Med. 2019 Apr 26;10:46. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_101_17. eCollection 2019.
5
Current Issues in the Development of Foetal Growth References and Standards.胎儿生长参考值与标准制定中的当前问题。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2018;5(4):388-398. doi: 10.1007/s40471-018-0168-6. Epub 2018 Sep 20.