Blazer D
Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1989;22(1):35-52.
In contrast to previous observations, which had indicated an increased prevalence of depressive symptoms among the elderly, recent epidemiological studies have shown a decreasing current and lifetime prevalence after age 20 or 30. The question whether depression is more or less common among older adults can best be resolved by turning to some of the core tasks of epidemiology: the identification of cases of depression, the distribution of cases in the population, and historical trends in the incidence of cases. In case identification there is agreement among clinicians on the signs and symptoms of depression, but controversy regarding depressive syndromes. The latter may be seen as forming a continuum (with little change in prevalence across the life cycle) or as including differing categories (with some, such as depressive reactions to physical illness, being more significant among the elderly). DSM-III and DSM-III-R do not capture all of the important subtypes of depression. Scepticism has been aroused over the recent finding of case distribution showing lower prevalence among the elderly because the lifetime prevalence has also been reported as lower. It is suggested here that a "cohort effect" may account for this finding. Recent data bearing upon historical trends suggest that the current 65- to 85-year-old group has been protected against major depression and suicide. While suicide rates do increase with advanced age in white males, current older men have lower suicide rates than previous cohorts at the same age (60 years). This may reflect better health and economic status of the current group or, perhaps, an increase of depression among younger adults now. Better case definition of depression and further epidemiological studies including consideration of cohort effects are indicated.
与先前表明老年人抑郁症状患病率上升的观察结果相反,最近的流行病学研究显示,20岁或30岁以后,当前及终生患病率呈下降趋势。关于老年人中抑郁症是否更为常见的问题,最好通过转向流行病学的一些核心任务来解决:抑郁症病例的识别、病例在人群中的分布以及病例发病率的历史趋势。在病例识别方面,临床医生对抑郁症的体征和症状达成了共识,但对于抑郁综合征存在争议。后者可能被视为形成一个连续体(在整个生命周期中患病率变化不大),或者被视为包括不同类别(例如对身体疾病的抑郁反应,在老年人中更为显著)。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)并未涵盖所有重要的抑郁症亚型。最近关于病例分布的研究发现老年人患病率较低,这一发现引发了怀疑,因为终生患病率也被报告为较低。这里提出,“队列效应”可能解释这一发现。有关历史趋势的最新数据表明,目前65至85岁的人群受重度抑郁症和自杀的影响较小。虽然白人男性的自杀率确实会随着年龄的增长而上升,但目前的老年男性自杀率低于同年龄(60岁)的前几代人。这可能反映了当前人群更好的健康和经济状况,或者也许是现在年轻人中抑郁症的增加。需要更好地定义抑郁症病例,并进行进一步的流行病学研究,包括考虑队列效应。