Jesinger D K, Gostick N
Duphar Laboratories Ltd, Southampton, UK.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1989 Oct;4(4):301-11. doi: 10.1097/00004850-198910000-00005.
This was a multicentre prospectively randomized double-blind parallel comparison of clovoxamine (n = 37) and diazepam (n = 35) in 72 patients suffering from anxiety neurosis, in general practice. Patients were seen weekly. Treatment was for 4 weeks (50 mg clovoxamine b.d. or 5 mg diazepam b.d.) rising according to response to a maximum of 300 mg clovoxamine or 30 mg diazepam daily. Drug was tapered off in week 5 and patients were seen again in week 6 after they had been off drug for at least a week. A treatment period of 4 weeks was selected in line with WHO guidelines for the testing of anxiolytic drugs. Although more patients dropped out due to intolerance on clovoxamine (24%) compared with diazepam (11%), analysis of completed patients showed that clovoxamine was equally effective with significant improvement in both groups at week 4 (p less than .001) compared with baseline Morbid Anxiety Inventory scores and Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores. Diazepam patients had a more rapid response which levelled off, whereas those on clovoxamine continued to improve after 2 weeks. At 6 weeks after taper off the improvement on clovoxamine was sustained whereas on diazepam there was evidence of deterioration after stopping the drug. Clovoxamine appears to have potential as an alternative treatment to diazepam for anxiety in general practice.
这是一项在普通医疗中对72例焦虑症患者进行的多中心前瞻性随机双盲平行对照研究,比较氯伏沙明(n = 37)和地西泮(n = 35)的疗效。患者每周就诊一次。治疗为期4周(氯伏沙明每日两次,每次50 mg或地西泮每日两次,每次5 mg),根据反应可增至每日最大剂量300 mg氯伏沙明或30 mg地西泮。在第5周逐渐减少药物剂量,在患者停药至少一周后的第6周再次就诊。根据世界卫生组织抗焦虑药物测试指南选择4周的治疗期。尽管因对氯伏沙明不耐受而退出的患者(24%)比地西泮(11%)更多,但对完成治疗的患者分析显示,与基线病态焦虑量表评分和汉密尔顿焦虑量表评分相比,在第4周两组均有显著改善,氯伏沙明的疗效与地西泮相当(p小于0.001)。地西泮组患者反应更快,随后趋于平稳,而氯伏沙明组患者在2周后仍持续改善。在逐渐减药6周后,氯伏沙明的改善效果得以维持,而地西泮组在停药后有恶化迹象。在普通医疗中,氯伏沙明似乎有潜力作为地西泮治疗焦虑症的替代疗法。