Jacobson A F, Dominguez R A, Goldstein B J, Steinbook R M
Pharmacotherapy. 1985 Sep-Oct;5(5):290-6. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1985.tb03430.x.
A total of 66 outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III) criteria for generalized anxiety disorder began treatment in a randomized double-blind study that compared the efficacy and safety of buspirone and diazepam. Thirty-nine outpatients completed the 4-week trial. Both drugs were administered in a 1:1 dosage ratio; the daily prescribed dose did not exceed 40 mg. The mean daily dose of buspirone prescribed throughout the study was significantly higher than that of diazepam. Diazepam had a significantly earlier onset of efficacy than buspirone, although both drugs were equivalent after 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse reactions were more frequent in the diazepam group. Total scores from the Hamilton anxiety scale and physician's global ratings show that diazepam was significantly superior to buspirone during the initial 2 weeks of treatment. These findings are further corroborated by the results of patients' self-rated scales.
共有66名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-III)广泛性焦虑症标准的门诊患者,开始参与一项随机双盲研究,该研究比较了丁螺环酮和地西泮的疗效及安全性。39名门诊患者完成了为期4周的试验。两种药物均按1:1的剂量比例给药;每日规定剂量不超过40毫克。在整个研究过程中,丁螺环酮的平均每日处方剂量显著高于地西泮。地西泮的起效时间明显早于丁螺环酮,不过在治疗4周后两种药物疗效相当。地西泮组的不良反应更为频繁。汉密尔顿焦虑量表总分及医生整体评分显示,在治疗的最初2周内,地西泮显著优于丁螺环酮。患者自评量表的结果进一步证实了这些发现。